you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]julesburm1891 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This. I had a disagreement with a friend irl a couple of weeks ago because she was on about demisexuality. Here’s how that conversation went: Me: how is that different from being a well-adjusted person with boundaries? Friend: it just is. Me:…but how? Friend: refers to a graphic novel she read and implies I’m a jerk for not being convinced

We consume more media than at any point in history, but people aren’t willing to examine their beliefs if it provides the slightest bit of discomfort or legwork.

[–]gadflyinajar 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm a huge fan of capitalism in general, because the freedom of markets as well as the increase in standard of living is to what I attribute much of the social change in the 1900s. I am afraid however, that by studying and really understanding economics, we might have opened a Pandora's Box. The commodification of art is a result of the "optimization" of things, but optimized art seems like an oxymoron. In any case, now most art is meant to solely garner fans and keep them, with the hopes of building a franchise. What's the most optimal way to do that? Pander. I also think maybe something in the human mind goes awry if you're pandered to so much, like a weird sort of para-social echo chamber effect, but I wouldn't know how to prove it.