you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Criticallacitirc 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The article says Autumn specifically went to the baker the day of the ruling to challenge that he wouldn't deny a customer because they were LGBT. If Autumn had simply requested a birthday cake and he said no, then I would say that is discrimination. However the specifically requested a cake for their birthday that celebrated their transition. Which In my eyes is not the same, the Supreme Court already ruled he didn't have to make cakes for things he didn't believe in....not sure why activists think this is any different?

Also....just leave this dude alone. Its absolutely insane that we devote so much space to ONE baker in Colorado.

[–]SuperGayIsOkay 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The worst part is if anything it's just resulting in increased hatred of LGB people by these religious folks and isn't actually helping anything.

[–]julesburm1891[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ugh. Absolutely. It’s just asshole behavior that’s going to fall back on us.

[–]insta 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Their goal is not acceptance. This is power politics.