all 11 comments

[–]justagaydude123[S] 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

First the comments on women's sports and now she's truscum. Is she gonna turn out to be one of the good ones? Buck already lost my respect when he said gay men would love his manpussy 🤢

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

She? He? We gotta stop using those incorrect pronouns, especially here.

[–]DiscoStegosaurus 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This always bothers me as well. It’s not “being polite.” It’s enabling the delusions and playing into the fetish. Calling them by the wrong pronouns is one of the things that allows this ridiculousness to continue.

[–]justagaydude123[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm willing to give the pronouns to those that try.

[–]Rag3 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ewwwwww 🤮

[–]LilianH 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I lost any sympathy I had for Buck Angel after Buck retweeted a comment from a trans man complaining that an optional surgery had been delayed because doctors had to do actual life-saving surgery on cancer patients.

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't she also beat up a women?

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Buck already lost my respect when he said gay men would love his manpussy 🤢

Some people are so naive...

The only difference between truscum and tucute is the gatekeeping question, in everything else they align with each other, including the 'genital preference' thing.

They're just jealous that tucutes can have access to trans identity while doing bare minimum in terms of 'passing'.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Caitlyn's about as serious a candidate as Gracie Allen was, in my opinion.

Republicans in California are using him as a vehicle to introduce criticism of transgender ideology into the public square. His former trans goddess status is a shield for them to float ideas like "maybe not everyone who says they are trans actually is" and "girl's sports shouldn't be affected by this movement." Not wild ideas, but ones which get widely censored so the general public never hears them expressed.

Ric Grenell (former DNI, first gay cabinet official) all but announced his candidacy months ago, I'm assuming they're waiting until the election is actually scheduled to officially declare.

[–]usehername 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Caitlyn Jenner knows nothing about politics and killed a woman with zero consequences.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I’m all for Californians voting for the candidate who is most likely to defeat Gavin Nuisance Newsome, even if it means voting for Caitlyn Jenner. But the Republicans can do so much better than this. Caitlyn has flip-flopped on whether MTFs should play on women’s sports teams. And as bad as the lockdowns are, a lot of Republican voters even in California don’t want to have a transgender governor. And I can’t blame them, because then you’re giving legitimacy to an ideology that has gotten us to where we’re at today. But who knows, Jenner could still win because there are a lot of Democrat voters in California who are sick of the lockdowns.