you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TiredTrendersSuper-gay 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Honestly, and if they hate having to weed through so many "toxic" posts then perhaps they should consider making the group exclusive again. I mean really, why are women either pretending to be men or nonbinary or etc. being allowed into groups made specifically for natal homosexual men?

What is it with all these wimps these days bending over backwards to appease the TQ+ crowd? It's clearly only made things worse than before yet they continue welcoming this nonsense into their communities. I just don't get it.

[–]JulienMayfair[S] 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In this group, the movement to make the group inclusive came from younger members who have been trained that inclusion is good and exclusion is bad, and there was some fairly overt ageism involved in some of the fights over changing the nature of the group with older members being called behind the time or obsolete. And we know how age works in the gay community.

In addition, transgender people and allies slowly maneuvered themselves into moderator positions, and when they had gained a critical mass, they issued an edict that anyone advocating exclusively gay male policies would be instantly banned.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Idk what it is, probably obsessive behavior or something... But they have an insane capacity to find their way into positions of power in the most obscure corners of the internet.

[–]IAmSatanVery... very... very gay. 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know right! It's quite impressive in a way.