you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]orangina5 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

no one admits to or is aware of trauma but you're still either heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual. the asexuality just seems like an intensity lever. it doesnt go beside them as an orientation.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Alright, explain Nikola Tesla then. He was famous for not being interested in anyone period, even though women fawned after him.

[–]usehername 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I know you're not talking to me, but homosexuality was a crime in much of Europe when he was alive, so he could have been gay.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Maybe, but the way that man described his thought processes and his hyperfocus on his work seems to point towards disinterest rather than homosexuality.

Edit: Sorry, he was very open about his celibacy because apparently celibacy helped him focus on his work, from what I can tell?

[–]INeedSomeTimeAsexual Ally 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah some of the historical "asexuals" were usually celibate or hiding that they were gay really.

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

he was very open about his celibacy because apparently celibacy helped him focus on his work, from what I can tell?

Ah, makes sense.

[–]orangina5 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

lol nichola tesla was gay as were most asexual men and women back then. as were most "bachelors". as were most "roommates". Or are you going by the "well, those two women together who spent 60 years together must have been such amazing roommates that no husband would be worth leaving your best buddy for".

"incel" was a word invented by a lesbian to help teach gays and lesbians to be content living perfectly alone, forever. the overwhelming majority of gays and lesbians were "incels". we were "involountarily celibate" and were taught to learn to be content with living a life of academic pursuit or some life meant for the greater good. and our culture is filled with lies and phantom identities for everything to satisfy the incredibly dangerous and violent curiosity of the heterosexuals. What were we supposed to say in those days? "yes, i am forever alone because im not sexually attracted to women because im _______ <--something i dont even have the word for but it's an attraction to the same sex?" That's quite a very cheap analysis, dont you think? And if public knowledge would have gotten out that he had a sexual attraction to men, he would have been the laughing stock of the world.

All our lives we were taught to worship chopin as some incredible, great composer. He was basically the face of polish genius and culture. Chopin was stupid enough to have sent messages back and forth revealing he was having affairs with men but he was always presented as "asexual" or sexless. Polish historians openly admitted that for the good of the nation and heterosexual supremacy, they hid this fact. Most geniuses that are held up as beacons of hope, genius and creativity of their entire nations and people tend to be gay but made so sexless and so covered up, that theyre presented as "asexuals".

There are countless examples of this in multiple countries. Armenia, one of the most violently psychotic and homophobic countries on the planet who desperately wants to show its enemies its superiority and their barbarism, their culture vs their degeneracy.... defined itself by the symbol of a poet and put him on their money. Now guess what this asexual turned out to be but it was hidden for "the good of the nation".

Why do i have to teach you these things? You're supposed to be a lesbian. So why do i know more about lesbians and their psychology than you? Perhaps you focus too much on their "im a woman" and less about the psychology of homosexuals. Being a sexual being in homophobic countries is rare. And the psychological damage done to these homosexuals in homophobic environments made them disgusted with themselves to the point where they were couldn't even get aroused as homosexuals.

You speak with such a paucity of knowledge on gays and lesbians. You're very welcome for having these conversations with me by the way. It helps elevate you from the incredibly superficial understanding you have of the world, especially of gays and lesbians. and in case you run away crying about the big bad meanie, notice how every single reply you got corrected your ignorance since i know in your head you like to think this is some 50/50 argument between you and me? do better.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm honestly wondering how you have the time to write all of this out.

[–]orangina5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

do you just want pity? it takes less than 1 minute to. sadly, i think you spend even more time spewing your ignorance out. At least you're learning. good for you.