DiscussionWhat I don't understand about heterosexual transgenderism and no one's been able to answer.

submitted by [deleted] from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

So hey, welcome to this sub. We try to stay away from broad, derogatory generalizations here about members of our own group (LGB). I encourage you to consider the parts of your response which appear to be veering into that territory; it is both inaccurate and alienating to others here. It's possible to talk about one's experiences without negating or devaluing others. No one here needs or deserves to have it stated or implied that their sexual orientation is not real, for example.

Thanks for considering. Cheers.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I think it's exponent2 or grammaroo with another new account. He used to blame lesbians for everything that's wrong with LGB, but now he's moved on to including bisexuals. He rarely criticises gay men and he very often uses capitals to emphasise his points. Just look up grammaroo's post history and you'll see what I mean.

Edit: he's also very long winded and drags things down the pyramid of debate. Debate with him, if you dare.

[–]reluctant_commenter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He has actually been hating on bisexuals for a while too, he started doing that like 5 accounts or so, haha. And straight women. All those evil bisexuals, lesbians, and straight women... and all straights... pretty much only gay men he won't go after.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw him complaining about black gay men, so I guess they're not safe either.

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I keep telling people to ignore this dumbass bc nothing he says makes any sense and goes on long rants about the evils of lesbians and bisexuals. Man’s a troll

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This appears, upon inspection of the comment history, to be sound advice.

[–]reluctant_commenter 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wouldn't be surprised if he upvotes his own comments with some of those dozen or so other accounts he's made, haha.

[–]nettygay5 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

heterosexuality is a category made by a gay social scientist. im not saying it's not "real". If "straight" men and women werent attracted to each other, civilization would collapse and we'd all go extinct. I'm just saying theyre using categories we gave them because when theyre considered normal, theyre just invisible, common and all encompassing. Just like how we roll our eyes at the word "cis". And we dont have a category for people with 2 eyes. I just meant theyre a bit more complicated and their identity is a bit more sophisticated than just "heterosexual". Just look at the explosion of bisexuals.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 9 insightful - 8 fun9 insightful - 7 fun10 insightful - 8 fun -  (2 children)

Just look at the explosion of bisexuals.

Oh no! We already have scary levels of poverty and poor mental/physical health-- now we're EXPLODING, too???

Maybe, like so many things in movies that are prone to inexplicable detonation, we are (as per the trope) Made of Explodium?

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MadeofExplodium

Guess the good lord took a likin' to us bisexuals (and made us up blow up real good).

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Another erased bisexual