all 42 comments

[–][deleted] 40 insightful - 8 fun40 insightful - 7 fun41 insightful - 8 fun -  (2 children)

"That's fine, we're not attracted to you either."

Why the fuck do they take being told "no" so badly then?

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 31 insightful - 1 fun31 insightful - 0 fun32 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they’re narcissists, and the worst thing you can do to a narcissist is shatter her or his ego.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, it's the childish sour grapes that's the most grating. I'll hold my hands up and say I've been guilty of that in the past but I wouldn't double down like this nutter.

[–]Tarlatan 27 insightful - 14 fun27 insightful - 13 fun28 insightful - 14 fun -  (3 children)

A man and a boy are literally different genders

Ah ha! There you are, going along being the boy gender, and at 13(?) you DO become the man gender? Bar noshitzah! Deep thinkers these people, deeeeeeeeeep thinkers.

[–]fuck_reddit 30 insightful - 4 fun30 insightful - 3 fun31 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

I saw that and it really creeped me out. Because if they think of "boy" and "man" as distinct genders and not biologically-set developmental stages... that makes "fem boys" an extremely pedophilic "identity."

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not to mention how much trans-identified males use “girl” not woman for themselves and for the unfortunate external targets of their desires. “Girldick” just got more barftastic than it already is.

Again, if woman, girl, men, and boy are merely social roles and not sex-based realities then no wonder no lesbian thinks she’s a woman anymore and is in line to chop her tits off because instead they’re trans men/non-binary/transmasc/someone who occupies the social role of not having breast tissue?? Exactly what social role of “woman” am I playing? Funny how they never define what those “social roles” are because things would get hella sexist real quick. Their selfish crusade of dismantling gay rights and women’s rights marches onward.

[–]fuck_reddit 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've been reading a lot of Aristotelean logic for a class I'm in, and their definitions of "boy," "man," "girl," and "woman" would be absolutely obliterated by any half-educated Medieval pre-teens. It's just astounding how they can accept the most recursive and blatantly-false ideas, and all they gain is a very temporary and extremely precarious sense of moral superiority. It's honestly baffling that they've managed to make the definitions of words a moral issue at all... As you've said, they base their definitions of words off of "social norms" and "roles," but they can't give a solid definition that applies to all women or all men, etc.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 32 insightful - 3 fun32 insightful - 2 fun33 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

"I harass gay people. I take over their spaces. I accuse them of not being real homosexuals. I get them kicked out of their own spaces. I make a joke out of their movements. I make countries like Poland more homophobic. I get gay teenagers castrated. Why do gay people hate me?!?”

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 26 insightful - 6 fun26 insightful - 5 fun27 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

Man and boy are different genders now? That's funny, I always thought they were just the adult and juvenile stages of the same gender...

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 15 insightful - 7 fun15 insightful - 6 fun16 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, and wouldn't her "logic" lead to epic dumbassery on the order of... elderly-gender! redhead-gender! thin-gender! tall-gender! bald-gender!

I mean, gender (except in linguistics) is bullshit anyway, and not the basis for ANY sexual orientation... but since it's determined by one's sex, and there are only two of THOSE... how can there be any more genders than that?

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

(except in linguistics)

You would be surprised how often this concept is misunderstood, and how popular the notion of de-gendering language is. Gender-neutral language works in English with minimal disruption because there are only the merest traces of grammatical gender left in English. It's literally just pronouns now.

But with languages like French and German this simply doesn't work without making major changes to the way the language appears. Verbs conjugate differently depending on the subject pronoun, and any number of participles and nouns have different agreement rules depending on the gender of the words that modify them. Gender-neutral language is impossible in French.

People get confused about 'gender' in linguistics because they don't know that in some languages the concept is simply called 'noun class' (though there is disagreement about whether they are truly the same). Swahili, for instance, has 15 noun classes. Is Swahili 15 times more oppressive than English?

On the other hand, you get languages that have no concept of gender or noun class at all held up as somehow more progressive and virtuous than languages that do, as if this is down to anything more than linguistic accident.

'We don't have gendered pronouns in Turkish,' Mehmet says with a smug, shit-eating grin on his face, as if the Turkish people collectively sat down and decided that the French and the Germans could take their colonial concepts of gender and shove it. 'We're so trans inclusive,' croon Tumblr users from some of the world's most oppressive regimes.

The Uyghur women who've been forced into 'anti-radicalisation training' must be thanking their lucky stars that they don't have to be triggered every time someone rehabilitates the passé notion of GenDeR by insisting that a table is female.

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can tell that gender theory was developed in anglophone countries just by this feature alone.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Well, that’s because they are different stages of the same gender.

[–]fuck_reddit 24 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 0 fun25 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And they wonder why we don’t like them. Vile behavior from a wannabe rapist.

[–]motss-pb 23 insightful - 3 fun23 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Your sexual orientation also exclude pre-pubescent males (boys) from your dating pool as well. It's not just sex, it's gender. A man and a boy are literally different genders, and sex is not the deciding factor there.

This argument actually proves that sexual attraction is based on sex and not gender. Puberty is a hormonal growth phase that leads to the development of secondary sexual characteristics. These are biological changes that create dimorphic phenotypic sex, not gender identity.

[–]fuck_reddit 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This was a distinctly bad-faith argument imo that shows how fucked up their "logical" definitions of sexuality are. Like yeah, I was attracted to boys... when I was a boy as well, as we mature, we (hopefully) develop preferences that match our age. I no longer like boys. Hell, I'm getting old enough now that there are some men that I think are too young for me. It might also be a form of projection on their part, which is even more disturbing to contemplate...

[–]Tikiri 18 insightful - 13 fun18 insightful - 12 fun19 insightful - 13 fun -  (1 child)

“My gay boyfriend” - #SureJan 🤣🤣🤣

[–]PatsyStoneMaverique 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I love that she felt the need to specify.

[–]julesburm1891 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Bruh, if your response to someone telling you they’re homosexual is to jump into pedophilia, you might be a massive homophobe.

[–]lavender_menace 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Even though her constantly bringing up of children disturbed me, I can’t shake the feeling it’s a troll and she was waiting for the right time to flip it against the sensible and earnestly arguing guy.

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I also found it disturbing. Too much pedo yaoi?

[–]lavender_menace 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who knows? I don’t know much about it, although I did hear it has a lot of troublesome tropes.

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I had a friend who was into it and I was exposed shudder there's a great thread on the topic on this sub: https://saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT/comments/7thk/yaio_and_the_false_narrative_of_escapism/

A lot of food for thought.

[–]NutterButterFlutterStill waving into the void 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like how they brought our SaidIt sub into it, as if that's somehow evidence of us being this little fringe movement.

(Also, hello stalkers! Looks like you didn't get rid of us after all!)

Sure, we're small here, but we started out small on Reddit too. In 16 months, we went from 0 to 23K users.

r/LGBT has been around for 13 years with 729K users. While that gives them an average of 56K each year, more than us ... lesser doesn't mean insignificant.

We were HALF of what they are, even with their hundreds of identities and inclusiveness bringing in non-LGBT members to falsely inflate numbers. I'd be very curious to see their subscriber count if they removed everything after the T.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Female incels. Just as terrible as the male version. Look kiddos, you can't force your crush to have sex with you. Especially not by insulting his intelligence and indeed, his very existence.

This is what would happen if groupies got bitten by stalker zombies.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

And also by insulting his looks.

Fuck me, you hideous bigots!

[–]lavender_menace 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It’s a fetish!

[–]usehername 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Highlights from EggplantEmoji_69:

Your sexual orientation also exclude pre-pubescent males (boys) from your dating pool as well. It's not just sex, it's gender. A man and a boy are literally different genders, and sex is not the deciding factor there.

So pre-pubescent boy is now one of the many "genders"

Thank you White colonizer for your white colonizer definition. That definition, created by white colonizers, is only applicable to those who accept the White colonizer's ways of thinking as the only correct ones.

After being told that homosexuality means exclusive attraction to the same sex.

You're literally telling my gay boyfriend he isn't gay because he doesn't fit into your White, colonial definition of "homosexual".

Oppression is over 9000.

If you're only interested in adult men, that's because you're attracted to gender, not sex, and sex isn't your primary filter.

If you don't agree, you're a pedo.

And by your definition, that would include children. So when someone identifies as "superstraight" or "supergay", they are including themselves with pedophiles, because pedophiles are also fixated on sex.

This is actually not true. The development of pedophilia is usually a gradual process, in which a person watches porn with younger and younger children in it. The deeper they get into the fetish (measured by the age of the victims), the less they care about the sex of the child. The idea that "boy" is a different gender from "man" legitimizes pedophilia by providing a legitimate door: "boy is just one of the genders I am hardwired to be attracted to (: " No. Pedophilia is a fetish, not a hard-wired sexual orientation.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Have you ever been told”you’re not a real gay” by other gay men? Not a loaded question, I’m just a curious trans man doing a study for the...uh...AHS institute...

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This is rich. A trans calling other people ugly and then later, pedophiles. Look in the mirror.

edit:

Go post a selfie we can laugh at, then we'll see what sort of standards we're lacking.

Savage

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

omfg miss eggplant is back at it... "like I get it, you're ugly" literally sounds like what 13 year old schoolgirl bullies used to say lmfao if she wants to convince people she's a grown man she's not doing a very good job

i do love spectating her tantrums though. my favorite was one thread where she said she's "conventionally good-looking and good with a strap" and thus had no problems in bed with her "gay" boyfriend. like ma'am, lots of masculine women are good with a strap. especially us lesbians. are we supposed to be impressed by this because you're straight and like pegging your bisexual boyfriend?

she and silentchief really are the dream team of epic meltdowns tbh i think eggplant should dump her bf and start dating chief. I ship it. OTP

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

She and her muscular masculine gay male body have departed this mortal Reddit coil.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

whatever will these gay men on AGB do without her bringing up vaginas and strapons constantly and calling homosexuality white supremacist. truly a net loss for the gay community. RIP madame eggplant.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

May zer posts rest in peace.

[–]Dromedary 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"You have a genital preference, and that's okay!" Fuck you, you mentally ill biitch. I don't need your approval or permission, being gay is not a "preference", and you deserve to be alone with your hideous, disordered personality.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ze has deleted zir account in a fit of pique so I think we can say the gay bros won that one.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. No such thing as a gay pedophile? ... The way she's obsessed with pedophilia is suspicious and reminds me of that yaoi thread we had the other day.