LesbianShout out to all the non-man lesbians

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from i.imgur.com

all 20 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 22 insightful - 14 fun22 insightful - 13 fun23 insightful - 14 fun -  (4 children)

If two non-binary males love each other, then that makes them lesbians?

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 20 insightful - 8 fun20 insightful - 7 fun21 insightful - 8 fun -  (1 child)

But if we apply that same logic to gay, then it should be any non-woman attracted to a non-woman, which means that a non-binary couple would also be gay. But what if those two people don't identify with either male or female? Now they're being bombarded with TWO "innacurate" genders, which goes to show that this was all bullshit from the start

[–]winterwillow 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The rule of thumb seem to be to interpret anything as 'queer' if you're nonbinary. Nb female + female = queer, nb female + male =queer. So a trans masc afab + trans femme amab = queer according to them, even if one goes by their ~genders~ it's heteronormative. As long as they get to be anything other than cis and straight, they don't care about inconsistency.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 14 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently yes, according to these clowns

[–]grixit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm. I wonder if i could rent a wharehouse, fill it with mattresses, and throw an open sex party. $200 a customer, we lock the doors at 10pm and unlock them 12 hours later. There's beer and snacks in the fridge, lube and massage lotion in the cabinet, soft music on the speakers, and a big hot tub against the wall. Non-men only, please. Enjoy your lesbian adventure!

[–][deleted] 21 insightful - 9 fun21 insightful - 8 fun22 insightful - 9 fun -  (1 child)

Can't wait for lesbians to start being harassed for not wanting to date non-binary males now. Just 1 more step after that and it's back to harassing us for not dating plain, ordinary men without mental health issues.

[–]julesburm1891 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Non-binary men: able to harass women and perpetuate rape culture without even pretending to be a woman while being cheered on by the woke.

[–]barnarnasis this tv show my friend? 16 insightful - 18 fun16 insightful - 17 fun17 insightful - 18 fun -  (2 children)

You've heard of WLW, now get ready for...

NMLNM

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

A few letters off from NAMBLA

[–]No_ 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is that the sound of a snake tasting it’s prey?

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 17 fun15 insightful - 16 fun16 insightful - 17 fun -  (0 children)

Non-binary is the consolation prize for men who can't pass as women.

[–]winterwillow 19 insightful - 6 fun19 insightful - 5 fun20 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I got banned from AL for arguing that lesbian means women attracted to women, and that it isn't political lesbianism (don't know where that counter argument came from?) to say so. Didn't even say anything about trans people at all.

This is just plain sexism, can't believe people who censor the word women with womxn have no trouble calling themselves non-men. This is why queer theory academia can be filled with hundreds of essays on 'what is a woman?' 'are lesbians women' 'constructing womenhood' etc, while never asking what a man is. Because everyone knows what a man is. A man has a dick that he penetrates with. A woman is the one getting penetrated. But oh no, some women don't want to be penetrated. Are they even women? And oh no some men like being penetrated. Are they even men? And with that they've constructed this artificial gray area which is basically the foundation of gender identity ideology.

Like I get it, there are discussions to be had about different parts of womenhood, like I'm a lesbian and childfree, of course womenhood is different for me than for a straight woman with kids. And at least I view my body differently because of it. But it's still a woman's body, and I'm still a woman. Not a non-man in a no man's (!) land between ~genders~.

[–]censorshipment 14 insightful - 7 fun14 insightful - 6 fun15 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

"The new meaning"... I swear all of this shit is linked. All of a sudden in the 21st century, white people can be victims of racism and men can be victims of sexism because "the new meanings" of racism and sexism include demographics that aren't marginalized. These new meanings of words are meant to include people who should be excluded.

[–]Dromedary 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

These are lunatics with too much time on their hands.

[–]SkinnyVanilla 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nonlesbians decided that lesbian has a "new meaning". How nice of them, but no thank you, not at this time nor any other.

[–]Taln_Reich 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Reminds me of a meme I saw somewhere. The First picture was Gigachad stating "I'm a straight guy", the second was the statement "Lesbian= non-man loving non-man" and the third was the same picture of Gigachad (with the inclusive pride flag, aka this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inclusive_PRIDE_Trans_POC_LG.jpg put in) stating "correction: I'm a masculine presenting, non-dysphoric he/him AMAB demiboy who is an aromantic, fraysexual lesbian". I'l try to see idf I can find the meme itself again.

[–]QueenOfTheNorthSuperLesbian 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Ah yes, the two sexes, men and non-men.

[–]grassfed 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes queen

[–]filbs111 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They all appear to have been primed with the same answer.

[–]clitoriana 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What in the absolute fuck? The kids are so far from ok.