you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 24 insightful - 9 fun24 insightful - 8 fun25 insightful - 9 fun -  (3 children)

So we're supposed to avoid "scrutinizing" trans people? I guess we're all supposed to stay at home so that trans people can wander around outside without fear of being triggered.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe that's what the lockdown was actually for? To allow transpeople and non-binaries to gallivant around without those pesky cispeople scrutinising and misgendering them.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 16 insightful - 10 fun16 insightful - 9 fun17 insightful - 10 fun -  (1 child)

But this article would suggest that lockdown is bad for transpeople and the non-binary, because if a tree is trans in the forest and nobody is around to validate it, is it even valid? (Hint: It's not)

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing is ever good enough for them, is it?