This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JoeyJoeJoe 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wrong. Check the latest post from Kellie Jay-Keen on YouTube. There's a "feminist" document being pushed through the UN, sponsored by all the usual alphabet + groups - trying to sneak through a LOWERING OF THE AGE OF CONSENT.

For puberty blockers, for sexual intercourse etc for kids. This is what happens when you let men call themselves women. Feminism means whatever the bepenised lesbians want it to mean, all so they can get younger prey.

I regret marching for these people.

[–]FediNetizenSuper-semi-bisexual (i.e. straight) 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I looked into this, and found that she was referring to this document. While it does contain alarming language that could be interpreted as supporting a reduction of the age of consent, this is a lobbying coalition, and nothing is being "pushed through the UN".

Would anything the PIE or NAMBLA puts out be interpreted as a threat to statutory rape laws? I think the answer to that is pretty clearly no. Call me when you've got a legislature actually discussing it on the floor.