all 5 comments

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hi Mods,

I'm confused - are we allowed to post new information on the unfolding Reddit trans mod scandal here, given that some of these same mods were involved in taking down r/lgbdropthet?

For instance, this? Pleaseremove if inappropriate!

Trans Reddit User Posted Hundreds of Pornographic Drawings of Child Characters Under 10, Mods Banned Anyone Who Criticized Them March 28 2021

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/trans-reddit-user-posted-hundreds-pornographic-drawings-child-characters-10-mods-banned-anyone-criticized/

[–]NutterButterFlutterStill waving into the void[M] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the unfolding scandal shows an impact on LGB, then yes, it can be shared.

That link you provided, for example, would be OK. Because it's not JUST about the trans pedophelia problem on Reddit but ALSO shows how it's infected and colonized lesbian subs.

What we don't want is our sub to become a repository for "all the bad trans/pedo" stuff. Because using our sub for that serves to amplify their voices and drown out LGB, which is kinda the whole point of us separating, yanno?

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Okay, if you're going to censor all new topics (and keep the sub in a perpetual state of "trans bad, lgb good, i'm oppressed because a teenager called me a cis gay" - and prevent us from talking about pedophiles in general (even non-trans ones) could you at least maybe remove affiliation with the sub for a pedophilic organization, /s/LGBalliance?

Yes, it's empty, but that's not the point. A lot of us homosexuals don't want to be associated with a fake "charity" that openly, explicitly discusses the hypothetical sexuality of children and posts pictures of little boys in dresses with creepy captions.

[–]KingDickThe2nd 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

explicitly discusses the hypothetical sexuality of children and posts pictures of little boys in dresses with creepy captions.

Any evidence of any of this?

[–]NutterButterFlutterStill waving into the void 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if you're going to censor all new topics and prevent us from talking about pedophiles in general (even non-trans ones)

Your ability to completely miss the point never fails to amaze me.