LGB ErasureWikipedia is the most homophobic site online. Note the absence of any category with the word gay in its name

submitted by hetisachoice from (en.wikipedia.org)

all 18 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 24 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

LGBT Anglicans | LGBT dramatists and playwrights | LGBT Roman Catholics | LGBT writers from Ireland

Obviously he must have been L, G, B and T at the same time. Seriously though, I remember Wikipedia had categories that were specifically like "Gay Whatevers | Lesbian So-and-sos | Bisexual This'n'Thats" did they all get changed to LGBT?

[–]our_team_is_winning 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, there's 5 "LGBT" categories on there -- because we're all one big happy, right!

Attaching T like a barnacle or an anchor leeches off the LGB and gives T the "discriminated against for our sexuality" cred they're desperate for in the eyes of the masses. How many people out there are now making the strange leap from "There's a gay guy at my work and he's really cool, so therefore straight men who role play as lesbians should be allowed in the women's toilets" because they think LGBTQ+ is all one?

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

its not just gay and lesbian stuff. A lot of feminist pages or achievements of women have been removed, combined or just rewritten with bias.

[–]oyasuminasai50 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I guarantee it won't be long before those titles are changed to "Queer." So people like Jameela Jamil get to be featured.

[–]hetisachoice[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Then we will prosecute them under the laws of every country with hate speech laws, starting with the UK. Seriously, I'm ready to throw people in jail for using that word. In fact, I demand it. I'm already out for blood after Disney+ put warning labels on The Muppet Show, and on the episode with JIM NABORS in it no less. Calling gays r-c-st is homophobic and thus hate speech because the word is a slur in and of itself when aimed at any marginalized group.

Gays can't be r-c-st because r-c-sm equals power plus prejudice and gays do not have the power to oppress. That power requires strength in numbers that LGB people don't have and hets do. That's why the word is a slur. That's why it's racist to call George Jefferson "the Black Archie Bunker": it is equating a Black man's verbal retaliation against white supremacy with said white supremacy. It is psychological projection. It is the exact opposite of the truth: Archie Bunker is the white George Jefferson. That's why it's not only racist to put warning labels on The Jeffersons but homophobic as well: Sherman Hemsley was gay and so was one of the Lionels. But to treat that and The Muppet Show as if they are equally incendiary when Jim Henson held no prejudices that I'm aware of is beyond absurd, it is a deliberate and calculated insult to the intelligence. And the same people behind it are the same people pushing gay erasure of this nature.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like replying to you is picking a low-hanging fruit but, I can't let "gays can't be racist" go unchallenged. https://newdiscourses.com/2020/02/naming-enemy-critical-social-justice/

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When identifying as a transperson ever gets one sentenced to years of hard labour for 'gross indecency' with the same sex then we'll talk about oppression.

[–]hetisachoice[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, and name one country anywhere where heterosexuality is illegal and homosexuality is not. One state, one county, one city, one township, one principality. ONE body of government anywhere on Earth.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I hate the acronym LGBT. Just say gay. But Wikipedia wants homosexuals to share our collective successes with the other letters of the alphabet soup.

If someone were to ask me "RedEyedWarrior, are you LGBT?" I’d reply "no, I’m gay."

[–]hetisachoice[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'd say "no, I'm gay, you homophobic misogynistic motherfucker!" And if they are white, then call them racist as well. Attack them with their own weapons.

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That sounds nice in theory but playing the "race card" does not work against trans people because they start talking about the hierarchy of opression. The TRA's are the worst to black women and then other woc. Like that Abigail guy that just came out as said if black women and south asian women can be women why cant I be too. What is worse than the racism, is when they start talking about fgm (female genital mutilation) victims and activists on twitter. There is no low, because a lot of them are trolls behind anime pictures, that likr to cause trouble because they know there will be no consequences to them.

Last week on Twitter a black transwomen faked her own kidnapping and scammed people out of tens of thousands of dollars. There were still TRA's defending "her". At that point if they are that stupid to be giving out money like that, shit...I want to be a transwoman too lol. Pay me for a boob job or else I will perish liberals lmao.

[–]hetisachoice[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Even the gorilla glue woman is not as stupid. All she lost was her hair.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I could call someone a homophobe for insisting on calling me queer or LGBT, but then again, it would be ridiculous. It’s not that I find LGBT and queer to be homophobic terms, I just don’t like the childish, radical connotations associated with these terms. By the way, I would not call the person misandristic nor anti-white because it’s got nothing to do with me being a white male.

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"Homophobic"

Jesus christ some of you people are as bad as TRAs. Failure to pander to your demographic is not a hate crime. Lack of categories like "gay porn stars known for farting" or "gay men in Cowboy soap operas" is not homophobic.

Wikipedia is a dogshit site and very biased, but it's not fucking "hateful" for them to avoid using the word "gay."

This is why so many people don't take the word "homophobia" seriously, because it's been twisted into a meaningless buzzword that SJWs and rich whiny men use when someone so much as does something mild they don't like. It's fucking insulting that I lived through a childhood of being viewed as "lesser" and a clown because I didn't look masculine and "look gay", and still carry that insecurity with me to this day and have a fuckton of mental health issues, yet some idiots think it's a personal "hate crime" for a stupid fucking website to not use the G-word.

Grow the fuck up.

[–]powpowpowpow 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean... look at this users name, it implies a sexuality is a choice and they constantly post very extreme/baiting stuff, they are probably a troll tbh

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

look at this users name, it implies a sexuality is a choice

Satire

[–]usehername 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought so too, but look through the user's post history, or even just her comments on this thread. "Gays can't be racist" or "black people can't be racist". She's an ideologue who tries to redefine words in an attempt to mold reality to her ideology. I wouldn't be surprised if she was a proponent of political lesbianism and "comphet" and means her username literally. That, or she's just a shill.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good points.