all 16 comments

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I had to stop after the demand to see the water sports association pissing on eachother while there were children in the background.

There are 2 100% mutually exclusive possibilities for pride, never allowed to mix ever. Either it is child friendly, safe for the public, inclusive of people, and helps the public image, OR you can have sex.

There is no way to do both. There is no world in which you can have wall to wall sex and pissing without it just being a fetish freak show. Etiher there is sex allowed or there are children allowed. You cannot have both

[–]Finnegan7921 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

That is the idea though, force people to expose the kids to the fetish freak show early on so the kids grow up thinking the fetishes are totally normal. 15 yeas later one of those kids is pissing on his first GF and wondering why she is getting upset. Thanks, weirdos !!

[–]Finnegan7921 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, the pissing thing was like 60 seconds in !!!!

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I’d watch the rest it’s very good video and not really about kink.

[–]MyLongestJourney 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Every human rights struggle,that is taken over by the woke crowd,turns into an abomination,no matter how legitimate it is at it's core. They are like cancer invading healthy tissues and annihilating them.

[–]julesburm1891 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My fiancée and I were talking about this a couple of days ago. We’ve reached a point where people aren’t going to care about actual sexism, racism, and homophobia because the woke are poisoning the well.

[–]Rag3 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This was incredibly cringe and awkward to watch. 😫. Poor pride. :(

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I think only the older generation can appreciate what this represents... we have moved from a time where we were harassed by police enforcing anti gay laws to a time when they won’t March in our parade unless they can do it uniform.

These kids can’t see beyond their Marxist manifestos

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I see people saying that Pride today should be scandalous because the original protests were super scandalous. Except standards have changed. What was once "improper" and unwanted in public, the stuff that a lot of the original protests and prides were doing, is not scandalous by today's standards. It used to be men wearing leather jackets and no shirts, which would get people laughed out of modern pride if they also wore the pants to match.

We won, those things that were once irrationally scandalous are now accepted in such situations, but people want more. They see the goal not as being allowed to wear that specific thing, but a constant battle for all of eternity where they've got to one up society every time society decides that something is no longer bad. Society says leather in pride is OK? Ditch the leather, we're wearing nothing but glitter with our dicks hanging out now!

[–]latuspodSuper Straight 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is a very good reason that they want things to get increasingly scandalous and constantly on upping society, its Critical theory doctrine. Art, political statements, any sort of protesting needs to be critical and revolutionary until the utopian liberty of Marxism is achieved. Herbert Marcuse set out the woke playbook decades ago, though many dont even know they are taking part.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

we have moved from a time where we were harassed by police enforcing anti gay laws

I've honestly never had very much sympathy for this argument. In my country the whole "historical homophobia of the police" ended in like the 80s-90s. Maybe I'm just too young to appreciate that but I don't know why some 30-something police officer can't participate in pride because of homophobic laws in the 80s & 90s. Really just strikes me as vindictive and the LGBT community should really move on IMO. The police aren't out in the streets beating gays out of bars, this hasn't been a thing for decades.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

the narrative now is that they are harassing trans women and they trigger lgbt poc. meanwhile a clear majority of us want police presence at these things.

[–]insta 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What amazes me the most is the people who are so vocally anti-cop are usually such soft and meek wealthier(ish) people.

If the cops weren't here to protect you, who do you think criminals would go after first?

Spoiler: criminals aren't going to be harassing the working class man, they'll go after the twinky gay boy with the iphone 12 pro max

[–]haveanicedaytoo💗💜💙 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

This looks like outtakes from a Chris Lilley show that were too cringe to make it into the actual episode.

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That guy who was talking to the cop at the start made my ears bleed.

Those vocal mannerisms are just so obnoxious.

[–]insta 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The irony that all these smug and meek little "Abolish the Police State" activists would be the first ones having violence acted upon them in an anarchist state. I'll never understand the logic behind cushy and soft activists arguing for criminals to be let out of prisons.

Who do you think they're going to target?