you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Criticallacitirc 27 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 0 fun28 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

"I only wanted the Happy Meal with the boy toy"

How to we go from its okay for boys to play with dolls to this kind of reasoning.

On a side note. I've seen an uptick in drag performers be bio-queens or transmen. Which I don't really understand. Regardless of your views on drag, the point is for a man to create an exaggerated caricature of a woman through makeup & costume. If you're already a woman..like what did you even do to create the illusion ? I've yet to see any bio-drag kings ?

[–]artetolife 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The "bio-queens" I've seen tend to go for the avant-garde alien kind of drag over the stereotypical "woman-face" stuff that gets complained about here (i.e. most RPDR contestants).

[–]turtleduck23 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

i always asked for the boys toy in my happy meal because they were cooler. often times the girls toys were always princesses or pink dollish figures.

[–]8bitgay 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's a great idea though. The muscular masculine gay men who get criticized for it (because toxic masculinity, masc4masc, evil white cis gay men, etc.) should say they're drag kings. "See, I'm not a toxic masc guy, being masculine is just my drag king persona".

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"I only wanted the Happy Meal with the boy toy"

WTF made it a "boy toy"? Did it have a little penis on it or something?

How to we go from its okay for boys to play with dolls to this kind of reasoning.

Or more like "reasoning"... yeah, I'm 100% with ya there: for someone who grew up on Free to Be You & Me 1970s-style anti-genderism, this crap is BEYOND dismaying. How can we be MORE backward about this now than we were a half-century ago???

Regardless of your views on drag, the point is for a man to create an exaggerated caricature of a woman through makeup & costume. If you're already a woman..like what did you even do to create the illusion ?

Yeah-- I always picture a female contestant who shows up looking like she just rolled out of bed (hair unbrushed, face unwashed, in dirty jeans and a raggedy-ass T-shirt) automatically winning first prize for Best Womanness. Kinda like dressing up as a pirate for Halloween when you actually ARE one.

Though this gives me an idea: a Drag Race-esque show where the goal isn't to look like a woman (or rather a caricature of one)... but to instead create a glamorous LOOK that's original, compelling, full of personality, and not tied to sex, sexual orientation, or gender. Anyone-- gay, bi, straight, male, or female-- could enter, and be judged on their imagination, skill, performance, and stage persona. Maybe this could be what "drag" evolves into? Aesthetic expression via makeup etc. that jettisons the traditional (and restrictive/sexist) association with the female gender-role? And thus with women, as well as their characterization as decorative/trivial? Cuz, gotta say: despite never having seen a single episode of RPDR to date... I'd watch the proverbial SHIT outta this.

[–]lavender_menace 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like your idea. Would be a better choice for that man to evolve his show than to lose his integrity like that.