Now it's transphobic to reject mtfs with neovaginas

submitted by blackrainbow from (reddit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]blackrainbow[S] 46 insightful - 1 fun46 insightful - 0 fun47 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

These people are totally delusional (and homophobic), they think that neovags are the same as natural vaginas.

If you aren't into penis, and a girl has a penis, I can understand not being into that, thats aesthetics (though being open to it wouldn't hurt)

Imagine telling this to a gay man or a lesbian woman.

You’re literally saying you would sleep with a cis woman with a vagina, but a trans woman with a vagina and the exact same appearance would not work for you.

THEY ARE NOT THE SAME

Nobody here is going to force anyone to date a trans person. But if a trans person is fully transitioned, and you still reject them on the basis of being trans, then that is transphobic.

"Nobody is going to force anyone do date trans people... But if you do, you're a transphobic piece of shit who deserves to die"

[–]Criticallacitirc 29 insightful - 11 fun29 insightful - 10 fun30 insightful - 11 fun -  (7 children)

The do say that to gay men, that a phalloplasty is indiscernible from a real penis. I just think it doesn't get much traction because anyone who has seen phalloplasty results know that the "penis" is an artistic representation made of flesh play-doh by someone who has never seen a penis in real life.

[–]hellonumpty 18 insightful - 9 fun18 insightful - 8 fun19 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

anyone who has seen phalloplasty results know that the "penis" is an artistic representation made of flesh play-doh

Oh my god, it really does look like that!

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

not to mention studies have been done and uh, the results aint good. here's a study i found from the Urology Journal :

"A total of 32 patients were identified: 22 underwent free radial forearm flap, 5 anterolateral (AN-TERO-LATERAL: : situated or occurring in front and to the side) thigh, 4 anterolateral thigh/free radial forearm flap, and 1 fibular flap phalloplasty. The median age at prosthesis implantation was 36 (range 21-59) years. At first implantation, 16 inflatable and 16 malleable prosthesis were placed. Of these, 5 were removed/replaced because of infection, 2 because of leakage, 2 because of extrusion, 2 because of dislocation, 2 because of dysfunction, and 1 because of pain. The postoperative course was completely uneventful in 10 patients. Of all implanted prostheses, including revision procedures were surgically replaced or removed. Their conclusion: Prosthesis explanation, replacement, or revision surgery occurs frequently after penile prosthesis implantation. Patients need to be well-informed preoperatively on these complication rates."

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

I knew it was bad but not that bad jesus... Do you have a link to that study?

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

yes: https://www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295(19)30543-6/fulltext

its research i did for my podcast.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thank you!

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

my pleasure :)

[–]chupacabrawitchI'm super thanks for asking 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ban the study then, it doesn't fit their narrative!!