all 67 comments

[–]slushpilot 34 insightful - 8 fun34 insightful - 7 fun35 insightful - 8 fun -  (8 children)

If you can't define it, you shouldn't be making new words.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The term has evolved into meaning a term for those who feel the current vocabulary within the LGBT+ community is not quite complex enough [to] accurately describe one's own sense of sexual orientation.

In other words, "the alphabets following 'T+' are insufficiently detailed and complex enough to describe the extra special snowflake that I am."

There really is an old-school word that describes such a person: narcissist.

[–]slushpilot 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So, LGBN? Makes sense to me, but what's a personality disorder got to do with it...

Haha.

[–]LilianH 16 insightful - 7 fun16 insightful - 6 fun17 insightful - 7 fun -  (22 children)

From a description of the book.

PoMoSexuals gives voice to 15 people living in the gray areas of gender and sexuality who struggle with what it means to have "nonstandard" erotic desires and identities in America. They represent people on the margins of gender and sexuality, ranging from a man who becomes a lesbian woman to a heterosexual woman exploring her attraction to gay men and a lesbian who writes gay male porn.

It's one of those books.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 17 insightful - 5 fun17 insightful - 4 fun18 insightful - 5 fun -  (18 children)

a heterosexual woman exploring her attraction to gay men

So she watches a lot of gay porn? Not sure how else one "explores" this without committing felonies.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Don't erase her other way of exploring her attraction to gay men: She makes daily posts in r/askgaybros asking for affirmation of how valid and masc she is.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

You're right, I forgot about the wonders of harassment for facilitating personal growth and discovery.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

That's a bit of a stretch. Lots of gay (or bi) guys are unsure and have "experimented" with women, I have. It wasn't rape, even if I didn't get much out of it, and saying otherwise is pretty disrespectful to survivors of sexual abuse.

In addition, a lot of people (gay and straight) don't seem to be able to comprehend bisexuality and call them "gay" regardless - a straight woman "exploring her sexuality" with a gay man might just mean sleeping with a bi dude she thinks is gay.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Right, in order to make either of these arguments you have to ignore the thing I was objecting to, which is the notion that a straight woman is going to go bang some gay men (who we cannot claim are "unsure" based on the verbiage I quoted, at all). Clearly not. Just like you weren't experimenting with lesbians, right? If you were, they weren't lesbians.

Let's do get our terminology straight and not try BS guilt trips. You are definitely barking up the wrong tree with "disrespectful to survivors of sexual abuse" (speaking of things that are a bit of a stretch, good grief) in response to someone questioning how a person would "explore" their attraction to people who, by definition, don't want them.

If we can all agree that TRAs trying to force themselves on lesbians and gay men is coercive, then a straight woman can't do it either.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Okay, and how exactly is a woman going to go out and just magically rape a gay man? Do you have any idea how hard that'd actually be?

It's literally impossible; they're not doing this. The kind of woman who fetishize gay men are typically awkward, young, and struggle socially in the real world. They would not be able to approach anyone with sexually predatory behavior like that, not to mention, how would they know who was gay and who wasn't? Not everyone is "out" and the only way they could guarantee finding a gay man is to go to a gay bar... but I really don't see that going well, because there's a ton of witnesses, and everyone would know she was female. And, again, it wouldn't be easy for a young woman to force a gay man into sex.

I'm not guilt tripping. I don't care if you care about me or not. All I'm saying is that trivilizaing abuse and saying that these cringy, most likely underage women are out to terrorize and rape gay men is honestly just plain incorrect and disrespectful.

"Trying" is a big stretch from doing. You seem to forget that 95% of TRAs live exclusively on Twitter, and don't stick to their claims in the real world. I'm in a social group with a few FTMs, even ones who claim that being gay is inherently "transphobic", but they've never once attacked me and they act like normal people in voice chat or in irrelevant discussions. For a large portion of TRAs this is purely fantasy that they'd never, ever be able to act on, because they are socially awkward or don't really believe in it. Yes, there are tons of MTFs and FTMs online bragging about how they could "trick" a "cis person" into sleeping with them, but how often does this actually happen? Not very often. Most people can see a trans person coming from a mile away, they don't "pass" as the sex they're trying to emulate and most of them can't go five minutes without reminding you that they're trans.

Again. You are a bisexual woman, so maybe don't act like you're the one to speak for every gay man. I don't even know why you would. But it's honestly pretty condescending if you genuinely believe that gay men are weak and helpless victims of straight women. It's just a bizarre thing to believe in.

[–]EverydayIsSad 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You say you are not a feminist but claim women can not rape men because "men are huge and can defend themselves duh" just like feminists do.

Do you understand women can use drugs to rape a man? Especially gay teens, they are helpless, and an adult woman is capable of sexually assaulting and raping a teenage gay boy. Women are not weak, sweet and helpless beings that can never commit rape on a man ever like you think

Yes, it may not occur as often as men raping women occurs, but it still does occur. And to ignore it is dishonest.

Edit: You have an issue with feminism because of the misandry that exists within feminism, and I agree with that, but all of a sudden you have no issue with women saying they want to "explore" their attraction to gay men and sleep with gay men ...

There's a hypocrisy right there that I want you to notice. Please keep in mind I am against misandry and man-hating of any form. I just want to show you where you are contradicting yourself.

If you have no issue with women who say they want to sexually assault gay men because most of them are socially awkward and can never do anything to gay men, then you should have no issue with feminism and feminists because most of these women who are feminists are socially awkward and would never act on their "k**l all men" or other things they say

Just change whatever was in your comment to this:

Most feminists are the kind of women who are typically awkward, young, and struggle socially in the real world.

Eventhough they constantly talk about "k**ling all men" and "getting rid of all men", they would not be able to approach any man with predatory behavior, not to mention, how would they attack men ... out in the public? I really don't see that going well, because there's a ton of witnesses, and everyone would know these women would be attacking men.

And, again, it wouldn't be easy for a young woman to attack a man.

According to your own words, misandry would have to be no issue.

Again, I am a woman and I still see misandry as an issue. Women should not joke about "k**ling all men" just as women should leave gay men alone and not say they want to sexually harass them, "explore" with them, etc.

I am just reminding you of your own hypocrisy.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Incidentally, I think you missed the fact that my question was exasperated humor. So the guilt trip gambit was especially precious in that regard. I am arguing, facetiously because I am confident the audience can get that, that obviously it would be abusive to play this out in real life given the context provided. It is not possible.

If that, someone arguing against abusing people, sounds to you like someone who doesn't get what being an abuse survivor is, then I can't help you. Kindly step off.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Why are you being so hostile? I'm saying no, it's not necessarily abusive, and calling everything you disagree with "abuse" is pretty toxic to those of us who have actually been through sexual abuse & other abuse.

Considering you're also a bi woman I don't understand why you've suddenly made yourself the protector and voice for gay men in this context, especially when you get aggressive when an actual gay dude steps in to tell you that you're being incorrect.

[–]EverydayIsSad 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just because you're a "gay dude" does not mean you know more than those of us who are not "gay dudes". The people above you were correcting you, and telling you you were unnecessarily aggressive. Instead of considering their points, you arrogantly used your "I'm a gay dude" card as a way to show you don't need to learn, because you believe to have figured it all out as a "gay dude". You haven't figured it all out. You are a "gay dude", not all "gay dudes" combined. So please, don't act like you are the voice of all gay men either, you are not.

If you don't want women to make themselves the protector and voice for gay men, then take a few steps back and realize you are not the voice of other gay men either.

There have been gay men who actually appreciated us women's concern for their safety when "trans men"/straight women talk about wanting to do something to them, such as wanting to sleep with them or "experiment" with them. And they thanked me for being concerned, pretty sure many gay men would disagree with you on the things you have said so far.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not going to help you keep digging this hole. If you aren't just here to antagonize people—I note that you have only been here for 12 days—then you are certainly making an effort regardless, by creating inflated and distorted arguments you can then refute, repeatedly. Enough already. What I said was perfectly clear and clearly a number of other people got it. It isn't my problem if you need someone to tangle with; I'm not available. Sorry.

And yes, I immediately shut down manipulative attempts to make other people feel guilty with false and distorted arguments and now, apparently, also gaslighting. So don't try that on me and then pretend to be a victim. That might seem like a cool new argument tactic to you, but it is super old and textbook to me. You were really reaching, bringing that here in the first place, and you are getting the well-deserved push-back from someone you 1. do not know and 2. have no business lecturing about surviving abuse, or understanding or working with abuse survivors.

Trying to create a conflict out of someone's humorous sympathy with the idea that straight women should probably not target gay men—which is a very common discussion point here, perhaps you were not aware, so I guess you'll have to admonish a great many other people in this group now, too, who care about those in the related groups—is just bizarre. Have a nice day, but point yourself somewhere other than me, thanks.

[–]EverydayIsSad 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I wanted to say I feel bad you had to deal with someone like VigorousTaintMassage, but your comebacks were really good. You're smart (☆>⊇<)

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

After several years of observing and countering these tactics I find it best just to give a condensed, summarized critique (or total silence) and move on. A point-by-point analysis, which comes to mind a lot faster during observation than the time it would take to write it down, is something I'd have to send an invoice for. They can figure themselves out on their own time, not mine. :-) Meanwhile, hopefully the consequences of not being self-reflective and sincere continue to add up until they are too uncomfortable to ignore. He says in his flair that he's 25. That's sort of all the information I need about what went sideways here. Dude still thinks he invented the world.

I enjoyed your responses as well.

[–]EverydayIsSad 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I know right? The "explore" part sounds so creepy because it gives me the feeling these women want to force themselves on gay men so they sleep with them. I heard women talk about how good it feels to "turn gay men straight" for them, these women should be sent to jail if they ever get close to gay men to "explore" because that would be them literally raping these gay men. Women should leave gay men alone, just as men should leave lesbians alone.

I hope gay men know not all of us women are like that. I'm a lesbian and enjoy watching and reading gay porn, but don't get off on or masturbate to it, I just enjoy gay porn in a non-sexual way. It really looks nice to the eyes. I've never gotten close to a gay man or bothered him at all in reality. Some of us are sane \\٩( 'ω' )و ///

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not to sound rude but I'm actually more concerned with porn use over "interacting with gay men", personally. Mostly because I've read up a whole lot on the porn industry and how vile it is. The abuse seems to be mostly focused towards women, yes, but males can be abused in porn too.

Basically unless something is literally amateur solo videos posted on /r/gonewild or something, I'm iffy about it because you don't know how it came to be. But even with those solo porn stuff, there's always a chance it could have been uploaded as "revenge porn."

[–]EverydayIsSad 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ah, people have their own opinions on these things for sure! Feminists are anti-porn just like you are (you may be a man but men can talk and act like feminists even if according to feminists feminism is something only women can believe in), while I'm not anti-porn. Every job, porn included, is vile to be fair. I learned that fact from anarchists. So unless one is against all jobs because there is a risk of someone being "abused" by their boss and other employees in a company, then highlighting porn industry and acting like sex work is some exception among all other forms of work does not sound logical and is too hypocritical for me to even consider it an "argument".

It's more like anti-porn people are anti-sex, and do not want people to have sex as work, and do not see other forms of work where people are wasting their body and time on as an issue. Eventhough they are all forms of work, and if someone wants to have sex as work instead of spending hours doing paper work, etc, then I see no issue. I believe it is not up to anyone to decide what other people can do for work.

Saying "men and women get abused in porn industry so do not watch porn!" is just like saying "all guns and knives are bad and the usage of such tools should be banned because someone somewhere can abuse these tools and hurt someone else"

I'm not against guns as I'm not against porn.

You have your own opinion! While I hope you understand others have their own opinions. Thank you for reading!

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...I am not a feminist. What? Being against porn doesn't equal feminism. I'm also pro-gun, so, again, what? Regardless of the definition of feminist, I am not one. I choose not to be, and part of that is because of the whole "all guys are evil and can't be feminists" thing, but also because it's deeply confusing and not relevant to me.

Yes, all jobs can be abusive, but my point is that porn is kind of on a new level. Slaving away at some corporate job, exhausting yourself for hours to earn very little is hellish, yes, but being raped is far worse - and that's usually what porn is. It's also humiliating & victims of it have to live with the videos of their abuse potentially existing forever for people to get off to. You don't get that with regular jobs. The two are simply not comparable.

[–]EverydayIsSad 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never said you are a feminist? Simply that you act and talk like them. The only anti-porn people I have seen were feminists. And they make the exact same "arguments" you do. Word for word.

That one can be raped and "abused" in the porn industry is not a criticism of porn itself. It is a call for the change of the porn industry, there is no issue with a porn where the men and women are not raped and instead are "exhausting" themselves for hours like everyone does in every job ever because they wish to.

They will have to increase the porn actors' and actresses' salaries, and make sure for them not to be raped and "abused" in the industry. That's the solution, not the banning of porn itself.

That they are recorded is also not an issue when they wish to be recorded. It's like acting. An actor or actress is recorded and their faces are for years to come plastered on books, cds, etc, and people watch them in the movies and films they acted in even when they are long retired.

As long as someone wishes to be in the porn industry, and recorded, then the recording is not an issue.

My argument simply was your "ban all porn and don't watch them because one can be raped and abused in porn" makes no sense just as "ban all guns and don't use guns because one can use guns to hurt others" makes no sense.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I heard women talk about how good it feels to "turn gay men straight" for them

I have not ever heard a sentiment like this, but having met a number of female predators—and we've discussed others here, the FTMs (straight women with extra steps) who hassle gay men—I am afraid I can believe it. I certainly hope it is rare and not something gay men generally worry about dealing with from women. Super gross.

[–]EverydayIsSad 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

and a lesbian who writes gay male porn

It's so messed up that these gender identity believers create labels after labels most of which make no sense whatsoever. I am a lesbian who enjoys watching and reading gay male porn. I don't masturbate to or get off on it of course, I just enjoy watching and reading gay male porn as much as I do taking a good bath every morning. Both feel nice, but I don't mean sexually. I would never ever accept being labelled as a pomosexual, and refuse such labels for my daily activities. What, are they going to call me internetsexual for spending many hours online surfing the web too? Just because I enjoy the internet? They are ridiculous ╥﹏╥

[–]fuck_reddit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is much worse than I thought... straight women that like oogling me aren't a "new" sexuality...

[–]hyunnahh 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

PoMoSexuals

I can't unsee "PMS" from this lol

[–]lazy-summer-godSuper Gay 10 insightful - 12 fun10 insightful - 11 fun11 insightful - 12 fun -  (2 children)

Pomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels.

Nopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels.

Nonopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels.

Nononopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nonopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels.

Nonononopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nononopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nonopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 7 insightful - 7 fun7 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

We need to go deeper

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My eyes hurt just from skimming this.

[–]hyunnahh 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

I hate this. I hate it so much when the description of a label consists of "their gender/sexuality can't be defined by words" or "doesn't identify as anything".

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 14 insightful - 10 fun14 insightful - 9 fun15 insightful - 10 fun -  (3 children)

'I'm the most special.'

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

i honestly am just watching this shit waiting for them to out special each other. fascinating.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

At some point it's going to come down to this, but upon further reflection I think maybe we're there already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyNyHark4xk

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

oh man, excellent reference!

[–]Tikiri 10 insightful - 9 fun10 insightful - 8 fun11 insightful - 9 fun -  (1 child)

Don’t want to give these folx any more ideas, but their raging flag fetish makes me think that Flagsexual may be the next thing.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

It's Vexillosexual you fucking bigot.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

Hmm, that's cute. Let's consult an encyclopedia about this. For anyone who didn't catch this, "pomo" is short for postmodern.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/postmodernism-philosophy

"Postmodernism, also spelled post-modernism, in Western philosophy, a late 20th-century movement characterized by broad skepticism, subjectivism, or relativism; a general suspicion of reason; and an acute sensitivity to the role of ideology in asserting and maintaining political and economic power."

  1. General suspicion of reason—check
  2. An acute sensitivity to the role of ideology in asserting and maintaining political and economic power—check

Through the looking glass for number two, of course.

[–]fuck_reddit 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

"Suspicion of reason"? I have yet to hear of a postmodernist that believes in reason...

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That would be how I interpret being suspicious of it.

[–]fuck_reddit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

True. Which kinda shows how ridiculous postmodernism is. They still attempt to use reason in their arguments despite claiming to reject it.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's how they try to get their Trojan horse through the gate.

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (5 children)

Just why.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

I thought it was Adam pomo attraction lol

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Adam pomo?

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oh wait, in italian is called like that. I confused the languages :D

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ah, I see, lol.

[–]Elvira95Viva la figa 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Messing italian and english sometimes :D

[–]fuck_reddit 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

This is like the fiftieth new "sexuality" that basically can be summed up as "a label for people who 'don't like labels' and are too complex to describe themselves, and you can tell both by the fact that they came up with a label to describe themselves."

[–]davids877Straight Male Man 7 insightful - 8 fun7 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

On this blessed day we are all pomosexuals.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels.

Then maybe, just maybe, the individual's perception or feeling as to whether or not their demonstrated pattern of attraction is consistent with one that has a name is not what's relevant. What's relevant is whether their actual pattern of attraction has a name. This is the mental gymnastics I played with myself for years. Yea so what if I'm attracted to women all the time and never men. It doesn't make me ~ gay ~. 🙄 Again, if perception of reality is all that matters, why do we consider schizophrenics to be mentally ill?

[–]fuckupaddamsBisexual Terve 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

These chicks talk about sexualities like they're pokemon cards. And yes I'm calling that this poster is a chick.

[–]lostinreverieMy ovaries are transphobic 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

At least Pokémon cards are actually worth something.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Pomosexuality: A condition where an individual fails to realize that there are only 4 possible categories of sexualies that they can fall into, homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual, and (as a mutually exclusive alternative) asexuality, and instead attempts to use the impossibly complex series of qualities and characteristics that defines them to say that their sexuality is somehow more complex than the 4 possibilities. Individuals that suffer from pomosexuality are often pretentious about this, and possibly other, facts and attempt to hijack organizations that were never meant to cater to them and this condition while accusing everyone else of being bigoted, closed minded, or otherwise primitive in their beliefs and language.

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

hi, i'm Fomosexuality...i fear missing out on things,...wait i mean sexual things...yes...sexualize it all

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i mean...its 2020, anyone can write something that sounds medically legit until you read it. the internet for some reason this year specifically, has give everyone the power to say 1 thing, and then have a cult following of believers.

[–]CuntWorshiperWomenholic full time | vagina fetishist part-time 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Pomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels. Nopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels. Nonopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels. Nononopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nonopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nopomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of pomosexuality, which defines a sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels. Nonononopomosexuality – sexual orientation condition where the individual feels that their sexual preference cannot be defined by labels, even of nononopomosexuality.

I’m laughing but with respect 🤣🤣🤣

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Also, because it is about as coherent as TRA garbage, I give you this classic:

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

Be sure to hit reload a few times.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

...Postmodern sexual? At least it's honest! People who can't finish Judith Butler's mile-long sentences without coming.