AL: Turns out dick can be great

submitted by blackrainbow from old.reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bastetkat 45 insightful - 12 fun45 insightful - 11 fun46 insightful - 12 fun -  (9 children)

Transbians gotta worship their own "girldick" because lesbians won’t lol. If they truly love dick, they wouldn’t complain about only matching with other mtfs on dating apps and getting rejected by real lesbians.

Edit: I also want to point out the inconsistency in their logic. They claim that,

-"girldick" = "organic strap-on"

-a transman's strap-on is the same as/better than a "cis" man's dick.

-"girldick" is completely different than a "cis" man's dick.

So... what’s the truth? Is "Girldick" just like a strap-on and completely different than a "cis" man’s genitals? Or is a transman’s strap-on is the same as a "cis" man’s genitals? (I already know the answer, dw)

[–]Ladis_Wascheharuum 24 insightful - 27 fun24 insightful - 26 fun25 insightful - 27 fun -  (8 children)

Don't be a material fetishist. It doesn't matter if the dick is made of flesh or silicone, what matters is what pronouns it uses.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (6 children)

This is the correct conclusion.

The mistake is in the original syllogism:

A=B, B=C, but A != C. Thus "=" cannot be a transitive relation (which essentially violates the essential meaning of "=", or in Bill Clinton language "it depends on what the meaning of the word is is".)

However, this is in error because the A's, B's, and C's are not the same. A(mtf)=B(mtf), B(ftm)=C(ftm), but because A(mtf) != C(ftm), it is clear that B(mtf) cannot equal B(ftm). In other words, a silicone strap-on changes its essential nature depending on whether MtF or FtM is using it.

If you disagree you are not following the transgender science, bigot.

[–]blackrainbow[S] 17 insightful - 10 fun17 insightful - 9 fun18 insightful - 10 fun -  (5 children)

Don't use maths! It's a white suprematist construct!

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wait, wasn't algebra invented in the Islamic Golden Age?

[–]blackrainbow[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

yes, I was sarcastic

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Unfortunately, I wouldn't be surprised if there were people who would think that unironically simply because we use algebra so much in modern western schools

[–]diapason 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are. I remember over the summer there were a bunch of Twitter users arguing over whether or not saying 2+2=4 is a universal truth was imperialist or not lmao

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's mathist against base 4 and lower number systems! sometimes 2+2=10!

[–]YoungHustle 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no my strap-on is non-binary. It wants me to pay for a bad haircut and thick glasses and call it Zander.