you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jiljol 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not considered homophobic (nor biphobia), it's simply just someone who normally dates the same sex but finds opposite sex attraction happening at rare times.

Which is, wait for it: bisexuality. Preferring one sex over the other doesn't make you "homo-"anything. It just makes you bisexual.

They're the 1-5s on the Kinsey Scale

Kinsey 2-5 (I'll assume you made a typo) is literally where bisexuality falls. What are you even trying to say?

They have their own label

Oh, come the fuck on. Why are you pretending like this terminology is in widespread use? The only instances where you might find "homoflexible" and "heteroflexible" are fringe academic pieces or SJW articles from the 00s. This is not standard language by any measure.

[–]BiHorror 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

wait for it: bisexuality. Preferring one sex over the other doesn't make you "homo-"anything. It just makes you bisexual

The thing is these people aren't bisexual. Majority of them considered themselves "flexible" not becuase of sexual attraction (only some which is what I called the 1 and 5s) but becuase they may have had, for example, that one fantasy with the opposite/same sex. They consider themselves gay/straight but not 100%. They had some fleeting "attraction" which was only for a moment, then vanished, but since they still had it, they wouldn't consider themselves 100%. There's other reasons too but I'm not gonna get into all of them. But another example would be gay/straight who aren't sexually attracted but would get into opposite/same sex relationship.

2-5 (I'll assume you made a typo) is literally where bisexuality falls. What are you even trying to say?

Nope, I wrote it correctly. On the Kinsey Scale they would be 1-5 (mostly heterosexual/homosexual, only slightly or incidentally homo/hetero).

Again, I'm not gonna force them to use a label they don't want. Also, no. I've not seen them used in SJW articles, I've started to seen them outside of it. Calm down, I get you expect this sub to be some hivemind but it's not. People got their own opinions on stuff. The label is not hurting anyone.