all 20 comments

[–]Lesbianese 36 insightful - 1 fun36 insightful - 0 fun37 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Black trans women"? Pfft, if you read actual accounts from Stonewall there were no trans individuals and no one can even agree if there was a brick thrown. This narrative is making me more and more angry.

[–]bopomofodojo 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is how cults operate. Repeat the lies, the mantras, the "truth", until the impure thoughts are purged from your mind.

[–]fuckupaddamsBisexual Terve 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

"Lies are just facts that haven't been repeated enough yet" - the Brain

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the fact that they're fighting so hard over a black trans women throwing the first brick says everything. They're trying to control a narrative over facts that aren't verifiable anyway. Like, if you believe marsha p johnson was a balck transwoman and threw the first brick then you're part of the club. Kind of like if you believe that jesus died on the cross for our sins then you get to be a christian. Christians can't prove it, but it's a requirement that you believe it if you want to be in the group.

[–]ElectricSheepSuperBi 30 insightful - 1 fun30 insightful - 0 fun31 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lol it's literally always been termed as "SSA" (same SEX attraction) even by the conversion camps. Homosexual and heterosexual are the default terms. The peace pipe must be loaded with something strong.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"I don't deserve to be in this camp, sir! That person I was sleeping with actually identified as female with a lady penis. You're being incredibly transphobic by locking me in here, you're misgendering my trans girlfriend and MISGENDERING KILLS!"

"Oh my god I'm so sorry how could I be such a bigot, please forgive me, I will learn and do better. You're free to go uwu"

[–]loveSloaneSuperDuperBi 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This doesn’t even make sense. It’s like they aren’t even trying to hide how stupid their ideology is anymore.

Also- how do they avoid acknowledging the footage of Marsha P. literally saying he was a man?

[–]artetolife 21 insightful - 5 fun21 insightful - 4 fun22 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

By calling you names, usually.

[–]BiHorror 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also- how do they avoid acknowledging the footage of Marsha P. literally saying he was a man?

Also the audio of him saying he wasn't at the riots

[–]chupacabrawitchI'm super thanks for asking 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Same sex attraction doesn't exist" oh thank god all this time I thought I was a vagina fetishist "black trans women threw bricks" no they did not.

[–]fuck_reddit 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Black trans women didn't throw bricks at police" You're right!

[–]PeakingPeachEaterfemale♀ | detrans🦎 | eater of peaches 🍑 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is pissing me off with their ignorance and blantant homophobia, that I've change it to make sense:

Same GENDER attraction doesn't exist to anyone except for homophobes and biphobes who want to redefine terms while ignoring lesbian & gay history. Same sex attraction is the actual term. A black gay man didn't throw a brick so that you could misgender and erase him, assholes.

I corrected their grammer/spelling too lol. It was bugging me.

[–]VioletRemiCat, homosexual one[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, it is so stupid.

[–]JulienMayfair 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting. "Same-sex attraction" was a term commonly used in academic articles during the 1990s, especially articles dealing with historical periods where the terms 'gay' and 'homosexual' hadn't yet been coined. It covered situations where men sought out sex with other men, but didn't think of themselves as gay if they were the insertive partner. It was the catch-all term. Objection to it just shows how far the goalposts have been moved.