you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have to ignore the claims of non-binariness to imagine including such a person under LGB. For the most part which sex they are is obvious, and if you look at that only, you can make a determination of whether they would be L, G, or B, but since they insist on telling everyone they are not their actual sex, I don't think a special effort is needed to include them. They can have their own islands of whatever and boink each other; nobody is stopping them. The very concept is an insult—that frankly seems deliberate—to everyone else, but if they want to make up a hill and go die on it, I'm happy to let 'em. They can hang with us when they stop insulting everyone's intelligence. LGB is about sex, not genderfeels, anyway.