Ok, so you're saying that ''nonbinary lesbians'' and neopronoun lesbians are valid but not bi or pan lesbians? If you're going to spew bullshit, at least make some consistency.

submitted by [deleted] from scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram.com

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]julesburm1891 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Okay so this is a terrible graphic. A) Garbage content. B) With the placement of the text, I can’t actually tell if they’re saying bi/pan “lesbians” aren’t real or if they’re complaining that the lesbian flag doesn’t include bi/pan “lesbians.”

If you’re going to make graphics for trashy beliefs, at least be clear in what you’re saying.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

this graph is worse than the stuff i made in 5th grade for presentations, it's barely comprehensible

[–]blackrainbow 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS "BI/PAN LESBIAN" FFS

[–]BiHorror 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So, can anyone tell me of the creator of the pink/lipstick flag is actually a racist or were they taking it out of context or something?

[–]lavender_menace 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Probably not, as they paint anyone who disagrees as any kind of -ist. Words mean nothing in their world.

[–]BiHorror 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Figured.

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can't find much info myself. The blog that the flag came from (This Lesbian Life) is now private, which makes it difficult to do any digging.

[–]BiHorror 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah... Only stuff I found was from pro-TRAs who not only accused of that but other shit but I couldn't find out true it was.

[–]windrunner 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. they're just stupid. First, none of that shit is 'valid'. Second, what I said first

[–]lavender_menace 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Relationship to Womanhood isn’t unique. In fact these are very common, every other person has one.

[–]fuck_reddit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"gender non-conformity" I mean, I kinda get what could be being said. I'm a gay man, so correct me if I'm wrong, but what about being a lesbian is inherently "gender non-conforming"??? Being with a woman does not erode a persons womanhood imo... wack