LesbianGals, is being a woman in love with another woman straight?

submitted by RedditHatesLesbiansHomosexual Not Queer from (reddit.com)

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]LiterallyawomanTERF IRL 23 insightful - 10 fun23 insightful - 9 fun24 insightful - 10 fun -  (1 child)

I can't believe a lesbian fell for a transman! It's almost like...

[–]i_serenade_cows 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

b-b-but you're being transphobic and this sentence is literally violence!

[–]PassionateIntensity 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Of course they will tell her SeXuALiTy Is FLuiD and she's really pansexual.

[–]julesburm1891 21 insightful - 5 fun21 insightful - 4 fun22 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Idk. My personal favorite response I’ve seen is “change your labels to validate the other person.” Basically: forget your identity and feelings. That only matters for trans people.

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Comments there are facepalm makers. First of all, it is still lesbian love, as they are both female.

It's okay to be "99% lesbian, except for this guy.

Why just not call yourself the correct name then - bisexual?

[–]MyLongestJourney 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

From the Reddit comments :

"It doesn't matter if youre two men, two women, a man and a woman, or in a diamoric relationship"

Diamoric? What fresh hell is this?

[–]MezozoicGayoldschool gay 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Checked their own explanations:

Diamoric - is term used by non-binary people to describe their orientation, which does not fit into the similar/opposite gender attraction dichotomy due to being a unique experience.

Seems it is same as "Omni-gender", which is "so unique that there no words exist to describe it". Just special snowflake word to describe specialness and snowflakeness of them.

[–]NiceDickBro 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Someone been looking for an excuse to use their word of the day calendar in a sentence by the look

[–]JizeraStraigth ♂ 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It is probably a fake post provoking them writing bulshit. OP has only this post in history and no comments. But if people wanted "revenge" them they could "brigade" their subs with similar "authentic" post.

[–]Feather 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It makes sense for people to use throwaways for that sort of question lest they be deemed a TERF.