you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Biden will fully support the tra's, the ongoing erasure of lgb and women as a sex. So if that's an issue for you then I wouldn't vote Biden. Trump doesn't care but will do what the religious expression crowd wants, so we lose the cake wars.

[–]IAmSatanVery... very... very gay.[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I mean, there're people who are gay and allies who think you should be able to refuse anyone for anything. I can appreciate that kind of thinking since it goes both ways, kinda like our situation with Reddit bans - should everyone or just some get to express their freedom of expression and choice in who they serve? I'm personally unsure. I am not a fan of capitalism itself though so...

[–]Archie 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm sorry but none of the issues discussed in this sub are as important as the right to access abortion. It doesn't make sense to protect the definition of woman if we lose women's rights anyway.

A trump reelection means a supreme court packed 7-1 with conservatives judges for the next few decades and the two new ones will be similar to Kavanaugh. This is much more impactful than anything else that will happen during this next election. I don't have even a second of hesitation before saying I support Biden.

[–]marigold 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This exactly.

[–]IAmSatanVery... very... very gay.[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a fair reply. Probably the best case for Biden I've seen so far tbh.

I just wished you guys had a better system and more parties to "actually" vote for so to speak.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think with the cake cases they made it about not refusing someone because their gay but because they didn't want to participate in the wedding by making a specific wedding cake. I don't know if I would be ok with refusing anyone for any reason, but devils advocate, it would allow LGB to make spaces that could legal just be lesbian spaces or gay male spaces or wlw, etc. Refusing anyone would be the libertarian case, I think. Either way the cake is like the pronoun battle imo, not the hill to die on.