"There's a limit to the amount of masculinity that can come out of a woman's womb"? Why is there an implicit suggestion that homosexuality = effeminacy? And also, why does not having chosen to be homosexual automatically mean that it is genetic? I didn't choose to speak English either. But it is certainly not genetic, even if it does run in families. Personally, I think same sex desire is universal and only sublimated in heterosexuals. Otherwise there couldn't be cultures where it is practiced universally (Sambia, Ancient Greece). I read that in ancient Sparta, where it was ubiquitous, attraction to masculine warrior males was so intense than in order to copulate with their wives, females had to wear male clothing and shave their heads.

Why is it considered a weakness in the argument for gay acceptance that it might be learned? I honestly don't like the oft-repeated claim "why would I choose this?", as if one would prefer not to be.

I think a more interesting question is "why is it that some people aren't attracted to the opposite sex?". Same sex attraction appears primary and fundamental to me and the reason society is so overwhelmingly homosocial. Denial is not credible in the context of ostracism and violence. The elephant in the room: Why would society have to police something that only manifests in a small percentage? It makes more sense if it is a widespread temptation that has to be pushed back.