you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I think the lack of censorship here on topics related to people of the Jewish persuasion was "too uncensored" for the moderation staff.

[–]72ndGender 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I always have to laugh at people who complain about censorship against them, and then complain about not enough censorship against others. Hopefully that wasn't the case with these folks though.

[–]scrubking 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I think it's just that people want to have their own site, but fail to realize that people don't want to have to visit a separate site for every single topic.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Could be, and I agree / it's a bit tiresome - but at the same time the "solution" to niche interest sites (reddit, etc) have not exactly resulted in more free speech. Freedom and privacy are always being traded away for convenience, and most people are happy to do it.

[–]deoxyribo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People want to be where there's activity. That's not SaidIt for better or worse. It's really that simple, I don't know what's the basis for every other conjecture.

I'm not crazy about visiting separate sites, but it has some potential benefits in terms of being (slightly) decentralized.
An official top-level ribbon combined with cookies will help mitigate the isolationist factor to some degree.