The War On Journalism In Belmarsh, The War On Journalism In Gaza

Drewski · 2024-01-27T07:49:57+00:00

archive.today mirror | archive.org mirror

JasonCarswell · 2021-05-08T20:02:26+00:00

Discovered via:
/s/conspiracy/comments/7ucr/james_rawles_coup_consolidating_power_in_america/

JasonCarswell · 2021-04-26T16:44:20+00:00

A personal record: I got 3 or 4 of my questions onscreen.

Edit: I stand corrected on the following...

~~Ironically she censored/edited one of them.~~

~~My original question was:~~
~~@Alison Morrow Please ask Jordan about "Behind The Green Mask" and the "environmental" Agenda 2030 eugenics global depopulation program. 5th Generation Warfare (5GW) is invisible to the targets.~~

~~She posted:~~
~~Ask Jordan about Agenda 2030.~~

PikonParadox · 2020-11-01T09:18:31+00:00

Thank you. I appreciate it.

JasonCarswell · 2020-10-27T14:29:14+00:00

We're all stewards of SaidIt. The sub will be cared for.

PikonParadox · 2020-06-07T12:53:21+00:00

Unfortunately I do not have enough knowledge or credible information to form a healthy opinion regarding the case of Jeffrey Epstein or the incidents involved. I do understand that some authorities are capable of, and will use their power to make things happen that can be claimed "legally" correct; that is basically using loopholes to avoid legal trouble.

Chipit · 2020-06-06T15:18:34+00:00

when you say the press has lied with malicious intent, are you generalizing the entire press as a medium or are you addressing any specific organizations, if so, which ones?

LOL. Okay, have you been in a coma since 2016? The media went from quietly lying to openly lying. They dare us to call them on it, and when we do, their buddies in Big Tech delete our posts.

It is reasonably ethical to use one's power to protect themselves from unjust harm.

The harm is just; it has been earned by the tremendous amount of damage the media has done to us with its lies.

Remember how ABC could have broken the news about Jeffrey Epstein, but didn't? They let children be raped. Literally. And when the story was leaked to the public and we all got to know the truth, ABC's reaction was...to contact CBS and get a low-level staffer fired.

Let that sink in...the only person fired as a result of the media's Jeffrey Epstein coverup was the poor young production assistant who clipped that moment and saved it to an internal ABC system. She swears she didn't leak it but ABC made an example of getting her fired from CBS News even though she didn't work for them any more. This was to serve as an example for the rest of the industry to show what happens if you let the people know the truth. Not a single executive at ABC News or Disney, their parent company has answered for it.

Multiply this times a million all across the industry.

PikonParadox · 2020-06-06T10:37:13+00:00

Considering the context, I believe the article is in response to the news reporters' "unpleasant" interaction with the police amidst protests.

It is reasonably ethical to use one's power to protect themselves from unjust harm.

To clarify your statements and avoid unnecessary conflict- when you say the press has lied with malicious intent, are you generalizing the entire press as a medium or are you addressing any specific organizations, if so, which ones? What is your definition of "left-wing politics" and who or what do you consider to be a part of it? Which fight are you referring to and how do you conclude they did it themselves? Who exactly is "people"?

Chipit · 2020-06-05T11:46:00+00:00

Ah, this is what's known as a "bullshit self-serving narrative." The press wants everyone to protect the press. Well there's news.

The press has repeatedly and with malicious intent lied to us, kept the truth from us, and in general engaged in left-wing politics with their coverage. We didn't choose this fight, they did. They have made themselves into the enemy of the people.

sawboss · 2019-07-11T12:44:24+00:00

https://saidit.net/s/Journalism/comments/tgy/rising_xenophobia_whats_driving_public_paranoia/

PikonParadox · 2019-07-11T05:21:55+00:00

Could you please link to a full video? These clips are ending as soon as he says "problematic". A full context may provide a better understanding of his words or if he was going to redirect the meaning his use of the word.

JasonCarswell · 2019-06-03T15:07:19+00:00

I think more people outside the USA may know about Jefferson that those inside.

USA has 300+ million people. Let's be super generous and say 2/3 of Americans actually know who he is, beyond being on money. That makes it about 200+ million. That's not even counting all the US territories.

I'm Canadian and we have 30+ million. I know FAAAAAAR more about American politics and history than Canadian. I am not alone. That makes it about 20+ million.

The American propaganda engine is the greatest in the world. I've art-directed on movies shot in Toronto pretending to be American. It's just how it goes. All across Europe, Asia, Africa, South America and Australia people watch American movies and television.

Of 8 billion people, half are dirt poor, but there's still a good chance enough know of Jefferson, not even 1 in 10 are necessary.

Jefferson is on par with historical figures like Shakespeare, Beethoven, Napoleon, and Caesar - though very different, from different countries, all well known.

Ping me whenever.

PikonParadox · 2019-06-03T14:14:41+00:00

Thank you for accepting. I appreciate your input. Currently there is not much going on. I'm simply trying to provide a place for journalism-relevant information.

Many people outside of the USA would not know Thomas Jefferson (including myself until recently), that is why I mentioned his title. I will update the sidebar anyway.

I like what you did with those subs' headers. For now, we will keep the default one. Custom header sounds nice though. Maybe we can do it after some time.

I will be a bit busy for some days but I will check in whenever possible. There is not much activity going on here, so I doubt there will be much need for moderating.

JasonCarswell · 2019-06-02T13:07:44+00:00

I think most people know who Thomas Jefferson is. "President of the U.S.A. 1801 to 1809." seems a little excessive and like hero worship. But it's your sub.

"Author of the Declaration of Independence" is up for debate. You might want to look into Thomas Paine and the views that he was actually the author.

Jefferson is one of the greats. I'm not disparaging him, but I'm also not putting him on a pedestal.

I like the quotes in the sidebar. Most quote online are not reliable. Wikipedia has pros and cons. Wikiquotes on the other hand has cleaned up their project and insists on citations and proof.

Here's one of my faves: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~ https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Voltaire

I'll accept and join as mod, but follow your lead. Let me know what you want help with. I can create a banner for you and/or add my CSS on my subs. Or neither if you like. I can do something custom if it's not too big like I did for /s/WatchPeopleDie and /s/WatchPeopleSurvive. Also, I'm not into being a moderator. I'm here to be a creative and to share, though if boner pill ads show up I have no problem deleting obvious stuff like that.

I find part of the sidebar confusing: " Try to post unbiased information. Cross check with multiple sources for accuracy. "

There really isn't such a thing as unbiased reporting. Chris Hedges can tell you all about that. In part it's an illusion. Every essay has a viewpoint and objectives - so too with journalism and documentaries.
Cross checking is not really what SaidIt is about. SaidIt is about sharing and aggregating. If all the journalism-related content is collected here to be brought to our attention, then, ideally, we can triangulate from several sources and determine accuracy, in conjunction with further research.

These are just my 2 cent thoughts. I follow your lead.

PikonParadox · 2019-05-29T09:56:49+00:00

Makes sense, thank you. I updated the sidebar. I want this sub to be used for sharing current affairs and anything happening to or related to journalism and/or journalists around the world.

Mnemonic · 2019-05-28T18:39:05+00:00

People are able to post here. The topics that could be posted here that are hot in the media right now are Assange things or Freedom of speech repression and all, which all can and are posted in other subs.

Though maybe a bteer picture of what you would want here to be posted is needed; is it about how journalism is conducted, how to earn money as journalist, articles being rejected because of some outside concern?

PikonParadox · 2019-05-16T04:20:14+00:00

It is necessary to educate the people to recognise and acknowledge the differences between each medium as they hold different values.

no direct relation with facts

"The Medium is the Message" -Marshall McLuhan.

In communication, how you say something is as important as what you say. It is essential to be kept in mind in journalism field. The way of saying something will influence the receivers' perspective and understanding towards what is being said. It is news, not a campfire ghost story.

zyxzevn · 2019-05-16T03:33:33+00:00

Actual title: U.S. journalism really has become more subjective and personal — at least some of it

A deep linguistic analysis finds that newspapers today are a lot like newspapers 30 years ago. But TV news — especially cable news — has ramped up the emotion, the conversationality, and the arguing."

It is a linguistic analysis, and has no direct relation with facts. It only has a relationship in how it is presented.

PikonParadox · 2019-05-16T03:21:39+00:00

Newspapers conduct proper query and are the most reliable source of unbiased information. TV news relies on emotions and mixes opinions amid facts, making it the least reliable source of unbiased information. Online journalism uses directive language and prioritizes timeliness which reduces its time-frame to improve the quality of the delivery of news.

PikonParadox · 2019-05-13T02:25:47+00:00

the woman who made the allegation now wants the case reopened