He doesn't even need to "debate" Wolff, but merely have a civilized conversation. Wolff is an expert on Marxism where as Peterson has a lot of shit to say about Marxism and most of it is utterly wrong - so Peterson in this regard, and many many others, is full of utter shit and spouting nonsense propaganda.

Wolff is very well aware of all the problems of the variant communisms. "Social manipulation and integration" and "corruption and infiltration" are hardly exclusive to the left or Marxists. They are aspects of Big Gov and if you knew much about Wolff, you'd know he's pushing for the 3rd Marxist ideal (as I do), worker coops as a solution for individuals and as an alternative to battle against the corporatocracy.

Big Gov is slavery regardless of whether you are a capitalist forced to pay taxes or a communist forced to pay taxes. Same shit with just a different organization at the top. If you aren't a multi-millionaire then you have absolutely nothing to worry about regarding "redistribution". Further, when he discusses redistribution, he's not talking about taking away wealth so much as simply addressing the means of production, starting with fair wages rather than exploitative.

You clearly don't understand Wolff nor Marxism either.

If Peterson's intellectual explorations are not open to criticism they cease to be legitimate.