you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

/u/hibikiblack

The Jesuit order was infiltrated by naturalist revolutionary Freemasons and anti-Christ Communists. Actual members of the Jesuit order were against Bolshevism and there encyclicals and letters prove this.

A quote from 'The Plot Against the Church':

"Concerning the repeated attempts of Jewish freemasonry to introduce itself into the Society (Jesuits) and to control it, another source gives us information about this freemasonic rite created for this gloomy purpose. It is stated in the official encyclopaedic dictionary of freemasonry under the term “estricta observancia” (strict observance): “Estricta observancia. Description for a rite which had split up into many others and represents the most perfect expression of the Templar system in freemasonry. This rite was the third freemasonic innovation of the Jesuits, who stirred up the hope among their supporters to come into the possession of the riches of the old Templars. The chronological history of the Grandmasters corresponds to that of the generals of the Society of Jesus. The rite of strict observance was finally set up in Germany, between 1760 and 1763, by the brother Karl Gathels, the Baron of Hund, who to the six grades of the Order at first determined added yet another. The rite was organised in the following seven degrees: pupil, companion, master, Scottish master, novice, Templar in three classes: Eques, Socius and Armiger, and Eques professus.”342

The fact that, since his grounding in this Rite which was intended to control the Jesuits, a new Grandmaster was also chosen if a new general of the Order was appointed, shows the tenacity of Jewry and its satellites, freemasonry, to introduce themselves in the Holy Work of St. Ignatius and to control it."

You wrote:

Well, despite the claim that the Roths supposedly control the Vatican because it never paid off the loans it had with them, not only did the Vatican actually pay those loans back, but it even used the own money of the Roths in order to spread the anti-Semitic myths:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulgZTDtpZrQ YouTube

This is a Zionist scapegoat narrative promulgated by racialist 'Jews.' All 'Jews' are knowingly or unknowingly part of a mass deception and stolen Judahite Hebrew identity for land confiscation. Jews are not Jews (Judahite Hebrews). A modern 'Jew' is either the tribal anti-Christ ghetto religion of rabbinism or Ashkenazi/Sephardi culture... they have no Semitic roots and are not Judahites.

The Rothschilds and their rabbinical heirs who founded counterfeit Israel by corproate money which funded the bomb and sword and Sassoon and Rothschild opium money, outright control the Catholic Church presently and you are execommunicated for even mentioning Zionist Jews orchestrating 9/11. In my recent posts I prove that Freemasons and Jews subverted the Church in its totality. Every Catholic that understand the naturalism of Freemasonry and Zionism, knows this.

You wrote:

Antony Sutton wrote about how the Rothschilds were involved along with other Wall Street bankers in the funding of the Bolsheviks, so the Jesuits intentionally funded the Bolshevik movement.

Sutton never said the Jesuits as an order funded the Bolsheviks. Sutton came out of a think tank that now produces unipolar neocon propaganda. His book, however, lacking minute detail, does prove that the Bolsheviks were backed by western bankers. Other books, such as the Catholic Dennis Fahey's 'The Mythological Body of Christ' go into more detail on the rabbinical, Talmudic banks involved.

You wrote:

Not only was Lenin a former student of them...

No, Lenin was not a student of the Jesuit Order. He was a continental freemason with 'Jewish' Yiddish ancestry on his mothers side. The Jesuit order in the early 20th century was being subverted by revolutionary masons and 'Jews'. Lenin also was agent to the Tsarist police but he was only an agent for the sole goal of infiltration and subversion in order to act out the revolution, so if he had been in relationship with the Jesuit order, it was for this reason. His Hidden Hand gestures illsutrate where his loyalty lies.

You wrote:

but despite the association of the Jews with Communism and it being some kind of Ultra-Zionist movement, the Bolsheviks Jews themselves were for the most part, an anti-Zionist group...

First, 'Jews' don't exist in the definition of the word 'Jew.' No, 'Jew' is a Judahite Hebrew. They all died out long ago. We can say, however, that all 'modern Jews' today, anti-Christ Rabbinics, Talmudics, and atheistical 'Jews' who proclaim Ashkenazi, Sephardi culture, etc., need Christ.

I have a list of 20,000 Bolshevik 'Jews.' There was a rift with Bolshevik 'Jews' and 'Socialist' Zionist 'Jews' who wanted their own national homeland, both however, were fine with Christian persecution.

The USSR supplied Zionist terror gangs with money and arms but Unipolarism got in the way and then the USSR started to fund the Palestinian 'Jews,' who were mostly hardcore communists. Nevertheless, it was a hegelian dialectic that led to the synthesis of Israel LLC. Moreoever, while Christians were being slaughtered by the Bolsheviks, the 'Jews' for many years remained protected and so-called anti-semitism was a crime that if one were to be found guilty on the slightest of suspicion, he/she would be executed. Solzhenitsyn gives a great overview of the 'Jews' involved in the execution trials. When Stalin came to power, where many of the New bolsheviks were communsit 'Jews' and non-Jews aligned with him, the old Trotskyist bolsheviks, now in the US and elsehwere under the neocon name, were killed off due to opposed communsit ideologies, not becuase they were 'Jewish'.

You wrote:

...that even persecuted the Jewish nationalists that opposed the regime.

By 'Jewish' nationalsits, you mean 'Jews' who wanted to pillage, plunder and make a homeland in an occupied Palestine? 'Jews' were fine up until 1922 when Lenin sought to liquidate the most nationalistic 'Jewish' groups with a 'Jewish' led Bolshevik group, that I touched on in my 10 part post on Bolshevism.

Now, I'm not going to completely whitewash the Jews away from the crimes, all the more when it comes to comparing it to the supposed Holocaust since I do believe there were Zionists mixed in with the Bolsheviks, but I don't think people should judge an entire group because of the crimes the worst of them commited, all the more when there was an intentional effort involving a lot of money from the Vatican in order to ruin their reputation.

Of course not, just like how you shouldn't blame the Jesuit order for communism when clearly they had nothing to do with communism, let alone supplying Bolsheviks with arms and funding. I won't completely whitewash the 'Jews' either because Jews don't exist. They are a ghetto religion and a stolen identity.

there was an intentional effort involving a lot of money from the Vatican in order to ruin their reputation.

Reductio ad Absurdum fallacy if I've ever saw one. So, this entire post you wrote is to scapegoat the Vatican, presently Khazar, Edomite, Caananite, Ashkenazi controlled, because anti-Semitism, when 'Jews' are not even semitic?

The Jesuits were also supporting the anti-Semitic movements in Europe simultaneously too, with it going way back to their initial writtings in La Civilita Cattolica.

The order was anti-Edomite, anti-Khazarian, anti-Caananite, yes. They sought to keep usurious 'Jews' from subverting the Church, they failed.

All of the rest of your quotes are hearsay. I could publicaly say thigns about Hitler and in 100 years someone could claim I was a Nazi because of it.

[–]HibikiBlack[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Let's see if I can make this clear...

The Vatican is a Jesuit controlled institution.

Despite the claims that the Roths control the Vatican, it actually used the own money of the Rothschilds in order to spread anti-Semitic propaganda.

The Rothschilds are the guardians and bankers of the Vatican, making them hechmen of the Jesuits.

The Roths funded the Bolshevik revolution.

Ergo, the Vatican and by extension the Jesuits, funded the Bolshevik revolution.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 2


In connection with this rite, it is stated in the freemasonic dictionary under the term “Elegidos Coons”, word for word:

“Chosen Coons. Description for a philosophic-spiritual, ultra- Jesuitical rite, which was founded in 1754 by a Portuguese Jew named Martinez Pascalis. Coons means priest in Jewish.” 5

Concerning the repeated attempts of Jewish freemasonry to introduce itself into the Society and to control it, another source gives us information about this freemasonic rite created for this gloomy purpose. It is stated in the official encyclopaedic dictionary of freemasonry under the term “estricta observancia” (strict observance):

"Estricta observancia. Description for a rite which had split up into many others and represents the most perfect expression of the Templar system in freemasonry. This rite was the third freemasonic innovation of the Jesuits, who stirred up the hope among their supporters to come into the possession of the riches of the old Templars. The chronological history of the Grandmasters corresponds to that of the generals of the Society of Jesus. The rite of strict observance was finally set up in Germany, between 1760 and 1763, by the brother Karl Gathels, the Baron of Hund, who to the six grades of the Order at first determined added yet another. The rite was organised in the following seven degrees: pupil, companion, master, Scottish master, novice, Templar in three classes: Eques, Socius and Armiger, and Eques professus.” 6

The fact that, since his grounding in this Rite which was intended to control the Jesuits, a new Grandmaster was also chosen if a new general of the Order was appointed, shows the tenacity of Jewry and its satellites, freemasonry, to introduce themselves in the Holy Work of St. Ignatius and to control it.

On the other side is the special wish to make this freemasonic rite in connection with the Templar Order very significant. We must not forget that the Templar Order was founded in order to defend Holy Church against its enemies. The “Synagogue of Satan”, however, gained entry into it until the secret Jews occupied the leading positions, then brought it away from its original aims and made it become a serious danger for the Church and the Christian peoples. One must also bear in mind that, in the prosecutions against the Templars, the effort was revealed to skilfully conceal themselves, for, although the Christian Order was watched over by the enemy, it remained in its official outward realms bound to Holy Church, even if also in secret circles the easier controlled Catholic Templars were seduced and their religious faith gradually taken from them, until they had finally become secret satellites of Jewry. The infiltrations of the Synagogue and of Freemasonry into the Society of Jesus followed visibly the same aims, for this freemasonic-Templar rite of the Jesuits wishes apparently to make the Society of Jesus into a new Templar Order with retention of its outer official structure is then finally secretly ruled by the enemies of the Church and then used in order to destroy its defenders and with the purpose of making easier the victory of Jewry and its satellites, freemasonry and Communism. From the valuable Freemasonic document, which we study, it is revealed that even other schismatic rites of Freemasonry, which were for this reason called mixed rites or also controlled by the Jewish Cabbalists, were organised in order to influence the meritorious work of St. Ignatius of Loyola and to control it. Accordingly it is stated under the expression “Clerigos de la estricta observancia”:

“Clergy of the strict rule of the Order. Title for a Jesuitical mixed rite, which was formed by Cabbalists, Alchemists, Black Magicians and members of the Society of Jesus.” 7

This is apparently a Freemasonic rite, which emanated from a schism of the “Rite of the strict rule of the Order”, which, as is stated in the dictionary of Freemasonry mentioned, was subjected to schisms. Both rites are of Jewish origin and we must allude to the fact that in Judaism frequently inner dissensions occur, which are reflected in the schisms which every Jewish party calls forth in the Freemasonic organisation, which at first is ruled by the Jewish cell, but then later passes through its own split. It is not further remarkable that to this Freemasonic rite, which is intended to control the Jesuits, Black Magicians belonged, for we have indeed already proved that the Jews were the most principal spreaders of the Lucifer cult and of Black Magic. On the other side, it was revealed, through many prosecutions of Templars, that in secret circles of the Order the devil was worshipped, even if the open outward structure of the Templar order appeared additionally so Catholic and orthodox as in good old times.