Debate a Jew

submitted by fschmidt from (self.Jews)

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

the usual anti-Jew theories

This throws any potential argument that you have out of the window. Political Zionists don't speak for or represent all Jews worldwide. The Rothschilds don't speak for or represent all Jews worldwide. You're coloring the issue when it doesn't need to be. I know you've been at this for years, so I'm left to believe that you are intentionally using this poor word choice.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hibs often conflates, 'accidentally', Jewishness with Zionism but tries to then pass it off as a Jesuit construct.

Israel Shahak isn't a Zionist. He's an ethnic edomite huamnist in opposition to racial Zionism.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

How so? My claim is simply that despite me actually sharing evidence that let's say, the Roths don't control the Vatican, you can see the same theories saying that they do over and over... Why is that even allowed?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...trying to censor like the JIDF does?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I'm just trying to say that over-generalizing your "opponents" positions is a terrible way to win them over.

Why is that even allowed?

Are you asking us to take down particular posts as misinformation? This is a public forum man. I don't understand where you are coming from.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Yeah, but the point of Saidit is also reaching the truth regardless of your views. At what point do I or others allowed to force our authority?

I'm warning you all again. I don't trust these Catholic groups pushing anti-Semitism on the site one bit and I don't care even if I have to confront Magnora over it. The CIA are The Catholics In Action.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know hibs. Maybe ban and censor me like you did on your Jesuit sub for posting a post about Jesuits.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The hearts and minds are sitting here giving you a chance to win them. The market decides.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So do you think the majority decides everything? Saidit can just as easily be astroturfed...

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, how cynical you are.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Everyone decides for themselves and the upvotes fall where they fall. If you see any crass/blatant/highly offensive anti-semitism, feel free to report it. This site is fully compliant with US and US-equivalent laws.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I just hope you are right and I'm just being excessively paranoid, but we are in a warzone and I don't expect them to play fair.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Cryptic language is obvious.

"When is enough enough," says hibs.

It's too ironic that you use the anti-Semitism canard as a monopoly on Jewishness. In fact, it's very telling.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I merely use it because It's the most popular word for racism against Jews, I couldn't care less about the semantics. Anyway, at this point I'm really worried about the ethic of the site. Back when I just met Magnora, one of the things that made me interested in his site was the way in which he said he felt disgusted about the way morality could be destroyed in social media. It made me remember how disgusting the choice of the majority could be, and how it could destroy truth, justice and even the beauty of nature.

Back when V_A was around more often I usually just reposted his stuff because I was kind of scared of taking responsibility for changing the tide and points of view of so many people all by myself. I want to believe that people at Saidit are just kind of confused the same way I was back then, but I can't help but feel worried. What's the point of me winning a debate or you beating me in debate when people have such a little understanding over the truth of things. How am I supposed to hold on to the hope that I can somehow pull off the similtaneous revolution plan when people are this confused?

Anyway, I think you guys had me right where you wanted. I was scared back then of ending up by myself like this, but whatever, I guess I'll just get creative and somehow turn the tide in my favour again. You should know better not to underestimate me.