you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fschmidt[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (24 children)

I will block this moronic user.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Says the dialectical-materialist Jew who wants to kill off half of humanity and says it was a good thing a pro-rape rabbi stole 2.5 trillion from the treasury.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

If you block people for being morons, I'm taking this sub off of /s/all. You know that this is a debate site. Sorry, personally block whoever you want.

[–]HibikiBlack 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (20 children)

Is it really worth talking to people who don't argue in good faith? Communism originated from the Jesuits and their ascetic practices, which were perfected during their Communist Empire in Latin América years before the Bolshevik revolution.

Also the Jesuit Comminist Empire is by itself a complete rebuttal against the claim that the Jesuits were slowly infiltrated by marranos, since their Empire lasted for over a hundred years and it was something the whole order was a part of. It shows you that the Jesuits have always been a group of radical supernaturalists that hate material world and keep pushing their degenerate monkery in the communist regimes today. And I already showed that the Roths don't own the Vatican either. So the usual anti-Jew theories look more and more nonsensical to me.

People should check my research about the Jesuit Communist Empire in my sub if you are curious about it. I touch their plan for a technocracy and their role in the Latin American conflicts as well.

Also, Marx was a self-hating Jew.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

/u/d3rr


Jesuits were always a construct ripe for infiltration and intrigue. Lolyola, although not Jewish, came from Jewish ancestry but was a true Catholic, such like Lieberman, who preached the gospel; and we can see today the Marranos (crypto-Jews), the Barber and trans-Atlantic Talmudic dominated slave trade and those 21,000 so-called 'Jewish' edomite Pharisaical bolsheviks by 1921 (Source: The 'Jews' of the Soviet Union) that used Catholic-Slavic Christian names; in other words: host country pseudonym surnames, to fool the workers and peasants.

We know, today, "Jesuits" control the Vatican. Well, no, the Cabalists, Talmudics and Masons run the Vatican, who are not Jesuits nor are they Catholics by any stretch of the imagination.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/066/186/273/original/0d1a36335985f3aa.png

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/066/186/276/original/c0b0f836f74dff7b.png

Fallacies of the Jesuit conspiracy theory (great read):

https://fitzinfo.net/2015/02/03/fallacies-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory/

Prominent Anti-Jesuit theorists that hibs like to sourve include:

Alan Lamont (Zionist, flat-earth disinfo), Edmond Paris (Mason; wrongly claimed a Jesuit wrote Mein Kampf and did not source this claim ; I debunked this in one of useless_aether's posts; also, Nazis are the naturalist antithesis of Zionists and Judeo-masonry; hence why Nazi's lost because they persecuted the church and the Mystical body of Christ); Eric Jon Phelps (Zionist, diamond dealer, LLC located in Israel, flat-earth disinfo agent, promotes racism and white supremacy to racialize Caucasians under the banner of Zionism; also claimed, like hibs did, that the Kennedy's were secret protestants trying to undermine the Catholic church, laughable when they were killed by Protestant Zionists and Judaeo-masons); Drake Shelton (exposed freemason of the Tennessee lodge, Jewish, flat-earth disinfo, racist, says JFK faked his own death.)

Edmond Paris wrote the book "Secret History of the Jesuits". In a 2018 update, we find there is an 'Edmond Paris Foundation' at 16, Rue Cadet, Paris.

https://bit.ly/3qeORfM

Whose address is that? - The largest Freemasonic lodge in the west. So one of the foundational texts pushing Jesuit conspiracy theories came out of a largely 'Jewish' Freemasonic Lodge?

https://godf.org/museefm/infos.htm

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/066/185/193/original/506728bdc0bafaba.png

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

/u/d3rr

Hibs, we know you're a Zionist.

https://fitzinfo.net/2015/02/03/fallacies-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory/

The only one not arguing in good faith is OP advocating for slaughter and murder of entire peoples. But you're not pointing any of that out, why?

Communism is Judaeo-masonic naturalism OPPOSED to traditional Catholciism, ie. Catholciism. Ever read anything Pope XVII wrote? Any of his enncyclicals? No, probably not. You and your masonic sources claim that monasteries, monasticism and monkery is communism. That's probably why Mexico's revolutionary freemason funded by sephardi Jews and detailed by Cssp Fahey, massacred Jesuits.

Like I said, how convenient that the rabbinic Jew Karl Marx would befriend a host of Jewish communists, Zionist Jews and masons, including revolutionary masonic founders of Young Germany and Italy and be blood related to the rabbinic Rothschild's unchecked capitalist commercialization of nations via their permeant public debt monstrosity, in total opposition to the supernatural santification of grace in Christ; just as how communism is the hegelian dialectic of the Jewish natural messiahs deification of the Jewish 'race.' Communism is a weapon to besiege, infiltrate and destroy Catholic nations.

Marx was a self-hating Jew.

He was not, he was a dialectical-materialist like OP. Claiming to hate Jews but covertly campaigning for the furtherance of the natural messiah's of Judaism via the rejection of Christ and destruction of the Mystical Body of Christ incorporated into nationhood and organization of society as a protector of His Way.

The only reason Jesuits were massacred or killed in these countries, not as the Marrano Jews and Templars we see today, that you call Jesuits, such as the Jew Castro, who had a few curious words to say about Israel and Zionism but was nonetheless Jewish; was because they taught natives trades that kings found to be a egregious lack of civility. It was better they work as slaves and be indentured then be included in the mystical body of Christ.

Secondly, tell me again who created Technocracy? That would be the masonic st-simson school which was considered a Jew school even by Jews themselves.

Again, anyone who cares for truth and not Zionist propaganda blaming everything on Jesuits, including 9/11, should read this:

https://fitzinfo.net/2015/02/03/fallacies-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory/

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

By Jews... I mean the modern def. 'Modern Jews' are Edomites, Khazars (Ashkenaz) and Canaanites.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

the usual anti-Jew theories

This throws any potential argument that you have out of the window. Political Zionists don't speak for or represent all Jews worldwide. The Rothschilds don't speak for or represent all Jews worldwide. You're coloring the issue when it doesn't need to be. I know you've been at this for years, so I'm left to believe that you are intentionally using this poor word choice.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hibs often conflates, 'accidentally', Jewishness with Zionism but tries to then pass it off as a Jesuit construct.

Israel Shahak isn't a Zionist. He's an ethnic edomite huamnist in opposition to racial Zionism.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

How so? My claim is simply that despite me actually sharing evidence that let's say, the Roths don't control the Vatican, you can see the same theories saying that they do over and over... Why is that even allowed?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...trying to censor like the JIDF does?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I'm just trying to say that over-generalizing your "opponents" positions is a terrible way to win them over.

Why is that even allowed?

Are you asking us to take down particular posts as misinformation? This is a public forum man. I don't understand where you are coming from.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Yeah, but the point of Saidit is also reaching the truth regardless of your views. At what point do I or others allowed to force our authority?

I'm warning you all again. I don't trust these Catholic groups pushing anti-Semitism on the site one bit and I don't care even if I have to confront Magnora over it. The CIA are The Catholics In Action.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know hibs. Maybe ban and censor me like you did on your Jesuit sub for posting a post about Jesuits.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The hearts and minds are sitting here giving you a chance to win them. The market decides.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So do you think the majority decides everything? Saidit can just as easily be astroturfed...

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, how cynical you are.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Everyone decides for themselves and the upvotes fall where they fall. If you see any crass/blatant/highly offensive anti-semitism, feel free to report it. This site is fully compliant with US and US-equivalent laws.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But I will tell you the blunt truth, and you aren't going to like it.

That's kind of ironic.