Compilation of arguments about the Jesuit control over the Mossad and Frenzy Holocaust conspiracy theory.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from self.Jesuits

Former German officer and Knight of Malta Reinhard Gehlen was instrumental in the formation and structure of the Mossad and James Jesus Angleton was in charge of the CIA’s relationship with the Mossad, making it part of the CIA, KGB and MI6 formation. Jesuit trained Shimon Peres gave the lands of Israel to the Vatican in the Oslo Accords. Neyanyahu left power on June 13, 2021, the day leaving 201 days in the year, shortly after bombing Gaza on May 10, 2021, 201 days after his birthday. The number 201 carries a special meaning to the Jesuits. A lot of Israeli prime ministers were also high level Freemasons and the Jesuit control over Freemasonry has been pointed out by many relevant figures in the past. The Jesuits themselves were very influential towards the Zionist movement itself. The Rothschilds played a huge role in the movement towards Israel, who have proven to side with the Vatican in order to target their “fellow” Jews many times in the past. The Jesuit control over Intelligence in the Middle East isn’t limited to the Mossad itself, but they even control the Palestinian authorities through the CIA, having both groups caught up in a Hegelian Dialectic that they can exploit:

https://saidit.net/s/Jesuits/comments/8hqn/the_most_dominant_strain_of_zionism_controls_the/

The Catholic influence over the Jewish Intelligence is no joke. I’ve pointed out many times in the past that the Jesuits are probably the most anti-Semitic group out there due to the Jews being a rather materalist group, which they can’t tolerate. They are an extremely anti-Nationalist group as well.

The Vatican believes that religious, nationalist Jews aren’t the rightful owners of the lands of Israel and that it actually belongs to Catholic Christians. So despite the fact that they own the lands of Israel, how are Christians overall supposed to reclaim it having a bunch of fanatical nationalist Jews willing to defend it? I thought about this theory years ago during the 2016 elections and I think people should know this. I was curious what would have happened if Hillary had won the elections against Trump, considering the Democrats back then were so bent on starting a war with Russia. The only thing keeping all hell from breaking loose in the Middle East is the relative cease fire that the US and Russia have with each other and considering that the Syrians and the Jews have more or less the same power, there would be nothing stopping the two from outright killing each other or render each other’s nations useless. I believe this is what the Vatican is most likely planning to do in order to take over Israel for good and kill both Syrian and Jewish nationalists as part of their depopulation plan. The only thing that could stop this from happening was the supposed invincibility of Israel and the Jews themselves, but as I have pointed out in the past, The Jesuits are the group that have the control over all the most relevant Intelligence agencies and have always went out of their way to blame Zionism and the Jews themselves for it.

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]mifu 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hibiki, does this sound true to you? Ran acoss it yesterday while searching for information on The Black Stone in Mecca:

History’s First Terrorists Came From…The Holy Lands

The Zealots were 1st century AD Jewish radicals who sought to free the Holy Lands from Roman occupation. However, a splinter group known as the Sicarii thought the Zealots were too soft, so they upped the stakes and became history’s earliest identifiable terrorists. The Sicarii, named after their knives, or sicae, blended into crowds at public gatherings, then suddenly charged their victim, stabbed them, and vanished back into the crowd in the ensuing confusion. They primarily targeted the pro-Roman Jewish aristocracy, and their victims included a High Priest of the Jewish Temple, after whose killing they went on a terrifying assassination spree.

The Sicarii sought to provoke the Romans, who needed little provocation before resorting to massacres and collective punishment. That kept discontent smoldering, lit new flames of resentment, and furnished a steady stream of new recruits from the families and friends of Roman victims. The Sicarii also engaged in sabotage to worsen the public’s living conditions and keep it disgruntled. Gifted with an occupier ready to resort to indiscriminate violence, Sicarii invited massive Roman retaliation, to force the hands of fence sitters. They could do nothing and still end up massacred or enslaved by angry Romans in no mood to distinguish “good” natives from bad, or join the resistance in a bid to gain freedom, or at least the dignity of an honorable death.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What does frenzy mean here? Just causing chaos?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, as in "mayhem."