you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Eric is also doing a good job exposing them so they probably have targeted him to discredit him. Notice how the other guy referred to Eric as "the enemy"? Why would he do that if he was on the right side?

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

it seems like he is using the good job of others in fact. last i heard his yt channel was banned for copyright violation (three strikes). and the videos in question are made by this other guy (southern israelite - john was it?).

additionally, it looks like he posted the research of veritas__aequitas (the same guy) as his own on reddit as well and as a direct consequence of his plagiarism, romerules is set to private for who knows how long..

not cool.

[–]ainsoph777 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Excuse me, but I exposed Veritas__Aequitas as being full of shit. I never plagiarized from his reddit....I was promoting his channel on my youtube. This clown gave me 2 copyright strikes and then I get a 3rd one from GEORGETOWN 3 days later. Your shill mentor VA uses Roman Catholic Latin as his name? Why? Is it becuase Jesuit Joannes-Baptista Caers, S.J. published the book – "Veritas et aequitas constitutionis Unigenitus theologice demonstrata" [The Only Proven Theological Constitution of Truth and Equity] (1723)? Are you white supremacist like VA too? https://www.reddit.com/r/Jesuitworldorder/comments/gzfnb5/veritas_aequitas_of_the_romerules_subreddit_is_a/ I would like an apology from you for calling me a satanist. Are you kidding me? Really?!--Also, making his Reddit private is yet more additional proof that Latin Veritas is a fraud.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

why are you using his work then? can't you do your own research?

and why are you promoting new age nonsense? you are supposed to know it is a jesuit creation (teilhard).

why are you discrediting the bible?

why are you denying jesus?

these are all hallmarks of a satanist.

when it comes to internet handles, why are you using ain soph (ein soph) which is kabbalistic name for god.

first it is kabbalah, which is jewish gnosticism, therefore it is a form of satanism. secondly you are clearly not god, only satanists claim to be gods.

laslty, is 777 the same as 666?

edit: you don't have to answer this last one, because: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/777_and_Other_Qabalistic_Writings_of_Aleister_Crowley

so, there is one thing va is wrong about you - you are not blavatskian, but a thelemist (i know, same difference).

[–]ainsoph777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

There’s so much gaslighting in your comment, it’ll take me a bit to respond. First of all, I have shown with documentation that VA has plagiarized from me. Secondly, I have way more of an output than Latin Veritas. I’ve done over 15 times as many videos and over 4 times as many blog posts, I’ve also published a preface which he hasn't accomplished. I was using my position as a bigger channel to PROMOTE him, what can’t you understand about that? That isn’t plagiarizing. I don’t accuse you of plagiarizing from me do I when you repost and copy my work onto your blog here? I don’t because that would be ridiculous—there’s no difference in what VA is doing. The Bible was obviously was written by men, to deny that is to live in a fantasy world. You act as if Jesuit Teilhard invented theosophical thinking—what a ridiculous train of thought and if you think Blavatsky is New Age then you are lost. I wasn’t aware that new age shills attacked the Vatican and Jesuits like Blavatsky did, could you please show me other “new age shills” who were militant against Rome? You should actually read her works too, I can tell you haven’t, instead of getting nonsense filtered to you from biased Christian speakers. You act as if the Bible was the first “holy” book ever written. It’s a fact that the Epic of Gilgamesh predates the Bible, so does the Ramayana and many other “holy” books that have almost identical mythos and stories as the Bible. It’s also odd that I’m now a satanist for using a Jewish name considering Jesus was a Jew. When did I ever say I was a god? Lol. What a ridiculous assumption to make. You’ve clearly been watching too much SouthernIsraelite and Eric Jon Phelps. I don't deny Jesus either , I simply interpret the scriptures differently than you, I've never said that the Bible is made-up nonsense. I think the teachings of Jesus can be very beneficial for ones development. The number 7 is mentioned 735 times in the Bible, there is obviously nothing sinister about it.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There’s so much gaslighting in your comment, it’ll take me a bit to respond.

no pressure! :-)

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

propagating satanism are we?

[–]ainsoph777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ahaha I guess whenever information gets brought up that makes you uncomfortable you can just dismiss it as Satanic—how intellectual of you!

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

paganism = satanism, genius. don't you know this basic fact?

[–]ainsoph777 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Paganism = Satanism is Roman Catholic dogma. You didn’t answer anything above either. You are also ignorant of history—Hundreds of thousands of “Pagans” were burnt alive at the stake by Rome.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

wrong. it's in the bible. but you hate the bible, so you hate to use it as a reference.

[–]yellow_algebra_31 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"pagan" just means country bumpkin, it's just an old word for "uneducated hick" basically, and imo has similar implications (positive or negative, depending on how you look at it). from pagus "country people; province, rural district"