you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Footmen of the Rothschilds, no doubt

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

it's the other way around!

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Potentially. The Rothschilds established the central banking game in the 1720s as they took over most of Europe. They definitely still have the Royalty of England in debt to them personally. Are Jesuits in use in the English central banking system?

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

both the jesuits and the rothschilds are templars. the founder of the dynasty, mayer amschel was knighted.

the papacy is run by the jesuits and the rothschilds are the guardians of the papal treasure.

not the owners. the guardians.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

rothschilds are the guardians of the papal treasure.

Yes aka they control the purse strings, aka they own everything. The boring title is just to make you think they're not running it when they are, I imagine.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What evidence is there that Central banking is currently controlled by the Roths and not the other way around?

We all know how toxic currency can get and how it has been manipulated, but who is pulling the strings?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The banking schemes and usury where trademen and bankers from Amsterdam, or Venetian merchants, or Babylonian money changers; the trapezoids, pried on the weak and poor, sucking their necessities dry is certainly not a new thing.

During the 13th - 16th centuries their were competing factors between the merchants and banking cartels of the Templars and Knights Hospitallers, against the Judaic merchants of Venice, Spain and Amsterdam who learned their banking schemes duringm the neo-babylonian period of exile. Many becoming court Jews for the kings of Babylon and emperors for Rome.

The banking schemes were not created by the Rothschilds per say, they perfected them. Similarly, the Templars created the IOU, the marrano bankers perfected them.

Yes, the Rothschilds, the Frankfurt school of new bankers competed against their British counterparts. Eventually, the Rothschilds would take over the Bank of England but in the 19th century these British banks fomented the Civil War aginst the Frankfurt school of bankers. Andrew Jackson who fought the British banks was a Freemason who helped the Rothschilds pervail, his statue is erected in some interesting places in London connected to the Rothschilds.

When the Union won the war, Lincoln sided with the recomstructionists, ie the JP Morgan, Frankfurt shhool of bankers who were part and parcel of the creation of the FED.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 1

/u/magnora7


Writings from Gordon Clark, 1896::::

The government of Great Britain has no respect, no compassion for the poor and ignorant. It has squeezed the life out of Ireland, out of India, out of Egypt — out of every race of human beings that are cursed with its domination. In the name of Christianity and civilization it imbrutes and impoverishes the whole world as far as possible, that English greed may rule the land and the sea; and then it hoodwinks and fleeces the millions of its own subjects at home, that one royal family and some thirty thousand landed, titled cormorants, may shine in gold and satin, and dine on grouse and brandy. For nearly a hundred years, the Bank of England has been a special partner and a ready tool in this diabolism. Virtually, the government winks at the bank, the bank winks at the government, and the two join hands to pillage the globe. Let us take the most notable instance on record — that of 1797.

[Alison’s History of Europe gives all this with copious and minute detail. Doubleday is also full and elaborate.]

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/magnora7


Part 5

Concerning loans for our second war with England, this same Thomas Jefferson wrote:

"The question will be asked, and ought to be looked at, what is to be the recourse if loans cannot be obtained.  There is but one — 'Carthago delenda est.'  Bank paper must be suppressed and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs.  It is the only fund on which they can rely for loans; it is the only recourse which can never fail them, and it is an abundant one for every necessary-purpose.  Treasury bills bottomed on taxes, bearing or not bearing interest, as may be found necessary, thrown into circulation, will take the place of so much gold and silver, which last, when crowded, will find an efflux into other countries and thus keep the quantum of medium at its salutary level.  Let banks continue if they please, but let them discount for cash alone or for Treasury-notes." [Letter to Eppes, September 11th, 1813.]

Thus, eighty years ago, Thomas Jefferson — the most elemental American yet given to his country — laid down, in substance, the most pressing requirement of our own day.  Clearly enough, if our industry and commerce are to have any safety, "bank-paper must be suppressed, and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs."  But this is not all.  We have just seen that bank-credits to borrowers and depositors — all such discounts and trust-entries on bank-books — are just as much "inflations" and are just as dangerous as bank-notes themselves, unless there is actual cash behind them for all emergencies.  We have seen that for this reason, confidence-banks of the British system must always "suspend specie payments" as often as really called upon to meet their full obligations.  When our American banks of that system carry more than four billions of credits to the public on their books and less than one seventh of the cash to pay them, how utterly ignorant, when not totally depraved, is the cry of "money enough — no more silver! "Since the panic, there has doubtless been money enough for the moment.  For after a man is dead, he can fly around as busily with one dollar in his pocket as with ten.  But if the business of the country is not to be the dead-man every five or ten years, money must displace and supersede both bank-ledger and bank-note inflations.  Business must rest on cash, whoever may lend and whoever may borrow it.  In the light of this palpable need, this easily-comprehended fact, is there any danger that the American people can ever have too much silver ?  All the gold and silver both on the face of the earth will soon be too little to make "honest money" for our country alone.  The thimble-rig of the bankers and bullionists once out of the way, we shall always be obliged to enlarge our metallic money with government paper if we are to be allowed to keep at work and earn our bread. As long, however, as gold and silver are "the basic money of the world," and as long as we are the chief producers of those metals, our duty to ourselves and to all other peoples imperatively dictates that we should employ gold and silver to the best possible advantage, at home and abroad, as far as it will go....

Continued here: http://yamaguchy.com/library/clark/walbert_index.html

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 4

/u/magnora7


Again, those who are specially represented by the great central English bank are enormous bondholders.  We know what these men want, whether Jews or Gentiles: it is to increase the demand for what they own — the gold that must be had to pay to themselves the interest and principal of national debts.  Once again, as representing the English Government, the Bank is an agent for the purchase of American silver at the lowest possible figure, as material for whatever silver-coin may be turned out at a profit to the realm.  But the Bank of England is connected, directly or indirectly, with all the great credit and bullion dealers throughout the world.  So it was not at all necessary that the Bank alone should foot the bill of Ernest Seyd.  He told his friend Luckenbach that others were interested, calling them "Germans."  Certainly.  The same Jew-bankers that since 1816 have been behind the scheme of demonetizing half the metallic money of the world would never be left out of this last "operation."  It is well known that the Rothschilds are the heaviest dealers of the world in silver bullion.  It is they who furnish the material for changes of oriental money-systems, as in China and Japan.  It is they who were back of the drain on American gold and silver from 1851 to 1863 — when nearly four hundred and eighty-millions went out of the country — and again from 1864 to 1876 when nearly seven hundred and seventy millions followed.  A few years ago — in 1888 — the report came from China that these Rothschilds had made a secret contract with the Emperor, to substitute silver coin for copper; and in 1889 the Viceroy of the empire Li Hung Chang put up a mint at Canton, to effect the purpose.  It was estimated that if the Chinese were to have even three dollars a head in silver money, the Rothschilds would require the world's entire silver-product for ten years.  These thrifty bullionists hope, of course, that they can always get silver in America for a fraction of its true value.  If they can find John Shermans enough, their prospects are favorable.[1]

The "subsidized press," however, is only one immoral offense of the epoch of the gold-bug.  American "statesmanship" — God save it from annihilation — has sunk quite as low as American journalism.  It is now perfectly evident that our two political parties which libel the holy names, "Republican" and "Democratic," are both little more than the decomposed spoils of London Jews and their New York twins of the English bank-system. 

The Remedy


There is absolutely nothing new or strange in this proposition to constitute gold, silver, and United States treasury-notes, the equal and self-redeemable currency of the American people.  It is "the American idea" as John Sherman might call it, if he should ever again indulge in the truth.

In regard to treasury-notes, Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to John W. Eppes, under date of June 24th 1813 said:

"And so the nation may continue to issue its bills as far as its wants require and the limits of its circulation will admit. * * * But this, the only resource which the Government could command with certainty, the States have unfortunately fooled away; nay, corruptly alienated to swindlers and shavers under the cover of private banks. Say, too, as an additional evil, that the disposal funds of individuals * * * have thus been withdrawn from improvement and useful enterprise and employed in the useless, usurious, and demoralizing practices of bank-directors and their accomplices."

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 3

/u/magnora7


When McCulloch followed the example of Ricardo, and made the people of the United States walk the plank of his craft of pirates, the result was about the same. Of many descriptions of this process, one of the most vivid has been given by Colonel Ingersoll:

No man can imagine, all the languages of the world cannot express, what the people of the United States suffered from 1873 to 1879. Men who considered themselves millionaires found that they were beggars;  men living in palaces, supposing they had enough to give sunshine to the winter of their age, supposing they had enough to have all they loved in affluence and comfort, suddenly found that they were mendicants, with bonds, stocks, mortgages, all turned to ashes in their hands. The chimneys grew cold, the fires in the furnaces went out, the poor families were turned adrift, and the highways of the United States were crowded with tramps." [Speech on "Hard Times," by Robert G. Ingersoll.]

How silver was demonetized in the United States, in such a way that even the President who signed the bill[1] knew nothing about it for two years, was long a mystery.  Of late, a good deal of nauseous courtesy has been wasted over it, among old party-hacks, in the Senate and elsewhere.  But there is very little doubt that this deadly drain upon our life-blood — this vampire-suck at the daily sustenance of every man, woman and child in the land — was bought and paid for, like the ooze of a slaughter-house, by the Bank of England and the Jews of Frankfort.  There is very little doubt that a retained financial adviser of European bankers, bondholders, and bullion-dealers, was sent from London to Washington, with half a million dollars in hand, and a million more at his back, to pay American politicians, who make our laws, to assassinate our interests.  There is very little doubt that this smooth, able foreigner, succeeded in his work — that he found what he sought as readily as if he had been looking for pigs in a sty.  There is very little doubt that with British gold — cheap for cash — he procured an American betrayal of the American people as detestable as that of Calvary and the Cross.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 2

/u/magnora7


Their doings, even yet, have never got to the general public; for their hush-money has been bountiful and their intimidations universal. But their method was simple. It was merely to play the old game of Ricardo and "Contraction," as played by the "gentle blood" and the Jews of England, in 1820 when they juggled the property of the island away from those who had produced it. It has been estimated that more than a million men, women, and children were murdered — by starvation and otherwise — in this process of garroting the circulation of English money.