you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TumbleweedFireflies 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (18 children)

Stunning kween, yaaaassss. I can see that girlhood shining through. Welcome!

[–]Pearls[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

thank you, nice to meet you!

[–]Questionable 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Hello. My name is Questionable. My online identity is text based.

[–]skeech 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

are you another one of them? oh god, i just threw up in my mouth again.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Now now buddy. To me everyone online is a middle age white guy. Just as they have been since the first time I went online back in 89. I don't tell you my personal information, and you don't tell me yours. Online I am simply text in a window.

Nice to meet you. Overreacting text message entity.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Online I am simply text in a window.

Do you sexually identify as a particular font or genre of fonts? (Serif/Sans? Scripts? etc) Are you attracted to a certain type of kerning? Are you looking to raise font families from being just some lowercase symbols? Have you considered upgrading to include other media? A picture is worth a thousand words.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)


Ĥ̅͛ǝ̮̺͕̲̰llo ʍoɹlp' I,m Qnǝsʇᴉouɐqlǝ.̬̘̟ͅ

[–]skeech 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

so, are you really a dude? like with a penis? omg. i just threw up in my mouth.

[–]TumbleweedFireflies 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (10 children)

Pearl is not "a dude", she is stunning and brave for coming out as trans. Please show some respect for this girl who wants to look pretty.

Asking about her genitals is bigoted, and maybe even predatory since girls are young and maybe even under legal age. You need to unpack your belief that women can't have penises, and not suggest such trans-mysogynistic biases.

[–]skeech 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Pearl is not "a dude", she is stunning and brave for coming out as trans.

nope, pearl is a computer generated delusion.

[–]TumbleweedFireflies 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. Nice find with that site!

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I doubt you ever met "Pearl", unless Pearl is an alternate account of your own, so you can't say what Pearl is with regard to anything other than: Pearl is the name of an account on SaidIt which is the account that is the "OP" of this topic. Also, "a dude" and "stunning and brave for coming out as trans" are not mutually exclusive.

As for your second paragraph: how do you define "women"? It is likely that you are using a definition that most people find useless. That makes communication difficult when it is not just out-right intentional deception. Women are adult human females, the where male and female are the two and only two sexes in sexual reproduction. Sexes refer to pair of roles played in sexual reproduction. Species that can reproduce sexually do so via two and only two functions in that reproduction. Males who can impregnate women can not be women. A "trans woman" then is a "man". You're welcome!

[–]TumbleweedFireflies 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

"Pearl" is obviously a fake account - either an astroturfing bot, or a real person trolling to make trans people look bad.

I was shitposting in response to "Pearl"s bait. Do I need to step up my sarcasm? Was I too subtle? Did I use too many TRA phrases that I seemed like an NPC? I thought I walked just a fine enough line to demonstrate the ridiculousness, while also encouraging the bot/troll.

Pssstt ... feel free to peep on my profile before raining your judgement all over me. I'm on your side, silly.

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

i apologize for not getting the sarcasm. I would not want you to mark sarcasm as that sort of weakens its punch. Though on occasions I've marked it to be safe. There will always be those who miss it, me here obviously, but that's just how it goes. I think it's not that you were too subtle, it's that the love-bombing in that cult is always over the top.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I would not want you to mark sarcasm as that sort of weakens its punch.

I disagree.

If it's witty it will not matter if it's "spoiled" by marking it.

I can appreciate it more with the clarity rather react and waste time refuting it.

[–]FlippyKing 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

if there some sort of time release "/s" marking then I might agree, but I think it gets close to the explaining the joke idea. A joke that needs explaining failed. Typing jokes is not easy especially since we learn the language of that through speaking and tone of voice and gestures.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

time release "/s" marking

That's a neat idea. But it doesn't solve Poe's Law so it gets closer to being a virtual prank than joke.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)