I'm here because I have opinions the left doesn't like.

submitted by [deleted] from self.Introductions

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mikipika 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

How does one "breed out immoral behavior?"

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

Don't allow imbreds, pedophiles, and serially-violent criminals to reproduce. You can penalize it, sterilize offenders, etc

[–]C3P0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

So eugenics? A problem is that pedophilia is not a trait like blonde hair. Anyone, especially those with similar life experiences, could become a pedophile.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I said I support eugenics, yes. Some people become pedophiles for genetic reasons, but many don't. If there is proof of a pedophile gene, then I would support eugenics measures. I support the death penalty anyways, though, so it ideally wouldn't ever need to be applied.

[–]C3P0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I didn't read all of your comments, so I am sorry I missed where you said you support it.

I don't believe such a gene exists. We are talking about human decisions--not genes. Similarly, there is no "gay"-gene. I could be gay for a day then never do it again. There is some dubious pseudoscience out there that says gay people have different brain scans. That's not real proof though.

Maybe there is a gene that carries a tendency to become a pedophile, a homosexual, a conservative, etc.

[–]C3P0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(Maybe the same gene that makes one tend to have a certain malevolent behavior also carries a tendency to create geniuses or immunity to some diseases.)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. I'll just focus on proven genetic diseases until then.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Do you support the death penalty for non offending pedophiles? Isn't that punishing thought crime?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You actually have to commit a crime to be punished for it. That should be obvious.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's not because a lot of people support finding and killing pedos, a la witch hunts.

If you support sterilization based on pedo genes, that may not be death, but it's still punishing thought crime. Steralizing convicted pedos is not really considered eugenics, it's more like corporal punishment. And it's usually castration that is advocated for.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is important not to confuse protecting the citizenry with punishing the outliers. We have borders not because we wish to punish those on the outside, but because we wish to protect those outside, for example.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What does that mean? Are you saying that you support killing pedos as long as it is framed as "protecting the children" rather than "punishing the pedo"?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I support the death penalty for pedophilia.

[–]Realwoman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I thought you're pro life

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

In my post I said with exceptions.

[–]Realwoman 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Haha, how do the exceptions make any sense? Why are you pro life? You believe in the sanctity of life but only the lives that you deem worthwhile? You don't believe in women's rights?

And how is society going to be better if women are forced to have children they don't want? What if they drink during pregnancy in protest? And the fathers are often deadbeats, how will it help society for women to carry the babies of deadbeats and assholes? Why let irresponsible men spread their seed? And why force couples to have children before they're ready? So that they can destroy their relationship with an unplanned child and let that child become a child of divorce with parents that are not financially and/or emotionally stable yet? And that will benefit society how exactly?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The problem is not the child of an irresponsible parent, but an irresponsible parent who has a child.

[–]Realwoman 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

You're so inconsistent. So if an irresponsible parent gets pregnant or gets someone pregnant, the mother can actually decide not to become a parent by having an abortion but you want to deny her that right because reasons?

I admit, your views are a special type of abhorrent. It's rare to see someone that wants to both stop some women from having abortions and force some other women to have them. You are obviously a man that treats women as incubators, not as human beings with rights. But oh wait, you're a "transwoman" because you like to wear clothes associated with women in our culture. You have no idea what being a woman is like. You're just a misogynist.

And please, stay out of women's bathrooms and locker rooms. You don't belong there.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Liberals just want to lower birth rates of certain groups that don't vote for them. Your kind doesn't belong in this country.

[–]Realwoman 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Haha, wtf are you talking about? I'm trying to use your twisted logic. Also, I support abortion rights worldwide, not just in the US, for every woman that wants to terminate her pregnancy. I'm a regular donor for charities that help women with abortions worldwide.

What is my kind exactly?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're a liberal.

[–]mikipika 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you are against socialism and advocate fascism?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fascism is a political ideology, not an economic one. It's a racist belief that can apply to Capitalism, Socialism, and Alternative economic ideologies. I'm not racist, so I don't support Fascism. I'm somewhere between Corporatism and Distributism.

[–]mikipika 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you explain why you believe Fascism is a racist belief? IMHO, Fascism is when Corporatism becomes so power-hungry that they start to eat themselves and the biggest cannibal becomes the figurehead. Also, thank you for your honesty. We have different beliefs and I appreciate your civility.