you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Papitas 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm quite antifeminist myself, but I agree they aren't women and never could be. BUT they aren't men as well. They are... transexuals, I suppose.

Our lives and experiences are quite shaped by how we look, that's why we (men) could never quite fully understand women struggles and viceversa. That's why, aside obvious biological reasons, trans will never be real women.

Unlike most people, I actually pity them. They can't be real men, but they can't be real women (mind and body wise). And if they want to transition and actually get a vaginoplasty, they won't get a vagina, but a malformed hole that doesn't even look like a vagina.

And if they want to find love, tough shit... the heterosexuals they like don't reciprocate (gays usually have the same problem).

No wonder suicide rate is so high among them.

[–]slushpilot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I feel the same, and I think you're pretty much on the same page with the GC crowd.

Pointing these things out so people can question whether the grass isn't always greener is apparently "hateful" though. As if that's what is keeping people out of the exclusive club, and not reality itself.

[–]Papitas 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel the same, and I think you're pretty much on the same page with the GC crowd

Wasn't GC a sub for feminists or something? If so, this just demonstrates we all can have civil discussions because we may have shared opinions even if we have different life experiences.

Even though we are different, we are not SO DIFFERENT we could never understand each other. We are humans, after all.