you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

it looks to me (and from what I know of saidit) that rule 4 is meant to prevent this kind of thing exactly. that you can't just exclude people on saidit because you don't like their viewpoint, as was common on reddit and voat.

how do you think "on-topic" applies here?

[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Rule 4B

[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

?

this is mod rule #4 that I see: "Mods must not remove nor censor good-faith AND on-topic posts or comments." I assumed by "b" you meant "a" is "good faith" and "b" is "on-topic"? are we not looking at the same set of rules?

[–]GreenCappy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

4b) Mods CAN remove opposing opinions that are high on the pyramid of debate, and ban those users on that sub, if and only if the 2 following conditions are met: 1: The fact the sub removes opposing opinions is announced in the sub's sidebar. 2: The mods uncheck the sub setting "allow this sub to appear on /all"

That's what I did

[–]comments 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh I see. I didn't see that rule on the FAQ page, I guess there's someplace else mod rules are written?

[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

thanks, I see it's linked from the Terms & Conditions page now. I guess the FAQ section on moderator rules is just a touch out of date /u/magnora7 /u/d3rr idk if you want to update that.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks I updated it