I've created s/FuckTheAltRight!

submitted by [deleted] from self.Introductions

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]comments 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

"fuck __" is objectively a sentiment devoted to the bottom two levels of the pyramid.

what exactly is it you stand for? it's clear from this that it's not universal wellbeing and compassion.

would you consider Israel and any of its supporters "fascist" and "alt-right"?

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

"fuck __" is objectively a sentiment devoted to the bottom two levels of the pyramid.

I completely agree and just banned the sub.

[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

What name do I have to give to a sub to be accepted then? Antifascism?

[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

far right isnt alowed there

isn't this against the whole concept of how saidit is supposed to work?

[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

See Rule 4b of moderation rules

[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

it looks to me (and from what I know of saidit) that rule 4 is meant to prevent this kind of thing exactly. that you can't just exclude people on saidit because you don't like their viewpoint, as was common on reddit and voat.

how do you think "on-topic" applies here?

[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Rule 4B

[–]comments 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

?

this is mod rule #4 that I see: "Mods must not remove nor censor good-faith AND on-topic posts or comments." I assumed by "b" you meant "a" is "good faith" and "b" is "on-topic"? are we not looking at the same set of rules?

[–]GreenCappy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

4b) Mods CAN remove opposing opinions that are high on the pyramid of debate, and ban those users on that sub, if and only if the 2 following conditions are met: 1: The fact the sub removes opposing opinions is announced in the sub's sidebar. 2: The mods uncheck the sub setting "allow this sub to appear on /all"

That's what I did

[–]comments 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh I see. I didn't see that rule on the FAQ page, I guess there's someplace else mod rules are written?

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Sure, that's an improvement. It's not using pejoratives and name-calling as a central feature so that would be allowed

[–]GreenCappy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can you rename my sub and bring it back because I don't want to wait 2 weeks please?

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry I don't have a way to do that in the code without spending hours, you'll just have to wait another 2 weeks. Please choose better topics in the future that don't drag discussion down the pyramid of debate.