Reddit says Trump’s social media order could destroy the site: Reddit is urging the Federal Communications Commission to reject a petition for rulemaking to amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, saying that if the section changes it “would change the very trajectory of the internet.”

submitted by [deleted] from dailydot.com

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Personal attacks are explicitly forbidden by saidit rules. Please stop and make arguments instead.

the "radical feminists" didn't ban anyone from their subs any more than anyone else did,

They certainly did. They interpret disagreement as harassment. Thus any who dare contradict them get banned.

That's why it was so wonderful to see them get the exact same treatment at the hands of even more radical leftists. I thought they might learn something about the value of not banning people, but no. They moved to saidit and immediately started banning people again. Pretty sad honestly.

[–]denverkris 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"They interpret disagreement as harassment. Thus any who dare contradict them get banned."

You are basically describing all of reddit, but whatever broheim.

"They moved to saidit..."

No, they didn't actually. Super impressive display of knowledge.

[–]roguecanine 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I mean, any sub has a right to set its own rules, why wouldn't it? Sometimes people don't look for endless debates, there are even separate debate subs for that where all those disagreeing people can go. Point is that the site should allow the subs do what they want, be impartial platform for any kind of sub to exist.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So when you censor others it's OK, but when others censor you it's not OK.

This is literally how primitive peoples think. It is pre-enlightenment thought. Back when the world was Christians and heathens. And you're the Christians.

[–]roguecanine 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lol what. I have no problem with antifeminists having their own subreddits/saidits and not allowing feminist debaters in. I do have a problem with saidit not allowing antifeminists/feminists to create forums. A pretty obvious difference ; )

To simplify - it's OK to create your own school club and set any rules there and not allow some people in. It's not OK for a school to only allow school clubs for physics geeks and not allow clubs for chemistry geeks.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have really bizarre, highly specific standards that appear to have been set backwards,in order to create an environment where you can censor others but they may not censor you.