Why dating in the West is so hard for curries and Asians

submitted by Currypill from self.Incels

I have a somewhat unique perspective because I have relatives of west Asian descent who were in the US as early as the early 50s, so I have been able to see how their lives play out, and hear their stories. From what I gather, it was not difficult at all for middle easterners and probably also curries and Asians in the 50s to date and marry white women in the USA. My grandfather married a white american woman from the South in the 50s, and his race was never an issue. The issue was that he was not Christian - this is what his wife's family gave him a hard time about, and they tried desperately to get him to convert, and they were upset that he never did.

It seems like since the 50s, dating in the West has gotten easier for blacks, but harder for east and west Asians. Why? It all boils down to how women perceive the races. Women view blacks as being low IQ and east, west, south Asians as being high IQ. Because of dysgenic evolutionary forces such as fischerian runaway selection, the r/K selection theory, and the sexy son hypothesis, women in our declining society want men who are low IQ and look low IQ. Therefore women today are more accepting of blacks, but absolutely hateful towards races known for being high IQ such as Asians and Indians.

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]asterias 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

to date and marry white women in the USA

I often wonder why so many non-whites have such an obsession with white women. The question should primarily be why is it so difficult to date and marry within their race, which is the real elephant in the room.

The issue was that he was not Christian - this is what his wife's family gave him a hard time about

One could argue that those Protestant denominations are not actually Christian.

While I agree about the low IQ preference of women, I don't know what to say about the correlation with Indians, as the situation in USA is probably vastly different to the situation in other places, where the various browns are gypsy-tier garbage of extremely low IQ. USA used to get the more accomplished ones of all immigrants, while other countries, especially in recent times, get only the worse that even their countries want to get rid of.

[–]Vortex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Skin tone, height, facial features.

[–]AnimeRespecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Giga high IQ post, but I am confused. Are you saying somehow that desirable traits that at some point were considered advantadges to survival (high T) are associated with a low IQ?

[–]celuloid 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Idk about east asians but the erroneous perception that most Indians are high iq is due to sampling bias. Only those Indians who are high iq are able to move out of India and secure a job in the west. The average to low iq people remain in India. In fact, according to some global surveys, Indians have among the lowest iqs in the entire world

[–]Currypill[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is irrelevant to the point I am making in the post. If Indians in the US are high IQ, Americans will think of them as high IQ.

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I will add to my previous answer, and again, the situation is obviously different in other places, but decades ago a foreigner would usually manage to get married locally after he was somehow assimilated, and other people would view him as someone who belongs to the place. Then women discovered sex tourism, men of low quality started trying their luck around the world and impregnating gullible women, and now you have millions of rapefugees from the third world flooding the West.