all 5 comments

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mean in Germany or elsewhere?

[–]Mazurro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You base it that eugenics would create only 6'0+ and athletic guys who would be considered attractive and it might be right...

BUT, you don't take into account one, the most important thing. Women don't base their attraction on certain features, but rather on how this feature is percieved by others and how this feature is in comparison to other guys. It would just be a different metric of choose then, 6'0 would be an incel height, while 6'4 would be considered as minimal height, face would be considered ugly below 7.5 etc. Women don't operate like "this is attractive and this is not", but rather like "this is MORE attractive, thus the thing less attractive is NOT attractive".

Foids are just something else.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

blackpill af. lol

[–]Mazurro 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's one of the most blackpilling things, the same as the fact what is considered average for women in terms of being a normie. To be average, you need to be average in ALL categories and you can be above average in few, doesn't change shit. However, if you are below average in ANY, then it's done, you will be considered subhuman because of this one feature.

[–]EternalSunset 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah because we are "Lebensunwertes Leben" and would have all been "euthanized".