It's not even the fact that we are being labeled as by far worse, or anything, I wanted to point out the metodology.
Look how in nowadays woke world, you can't say anything about GROUPS. You have something against gay people? Homophobe. You have something against Jews? Xenophobe. It goes along with literally every group, you can't say that certain group does something or shares some feature which is wrong. However, it is completely valid to cancel people, organisations AND criticize people but only based on things which don't reason their group belonging. As in - you can't criticize a gay person that he is obnoxious with being gay, you have to find another argument, etc. But anyway, it is completely viable to criticize normal people, if only we don't do it to a group.
However, when it comes to incels, check what they are saying. They always say that there are incels who are not evil who are just unlucky, but anyway "all incels are the same". You see a contradiction, right? But they don't. Every single time when they notice a person who shares ALL features of incels, they want to "delabel" them and say, "nooo you are just a virgin, not an incel, or they don't even do that - but the generalisation of incels goes the same way. It's absurd in it's construction even, look how would it look if we twisted
There are some incels who are good, caring, not hateful, but all incels are the same.
There are some priests who are good, caring and not bad at all, but all priests are pedophiles.
They always say, that you must be an invididual, your personality is based on your actions and behaviour, but if you are sexless and without relationship, you still remain with a label, which makes you "the same".
It's just hilarious how they wokeism only works in fields, where it is convinient for them - if only something is what they don't like - free for all, you can hate it any way you want.
Atleast quitting society is an option, otherwise I don't know how would I be able to function further.
[–]greybeard 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Mazurro[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Vortex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]yabbit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Mazurro[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]willialey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]eddielydon00 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]lorenaduran 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)