use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Rules 1. Follow saidit ToS. 2. No advocating for violence. 3. NO fakecels/chads/trolling or not keeping the conversation relevant to the incel topic. 4.NO Bragging 5.NO harassment of other members. 6.NO ban evasion
Credit to Lord_DC for css
Prove inkwell wrong mainstream edition
submitted 2 years ago by Salvador6feet6 from joe.co.uk
[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (4 children)
I couldn't find the original article they are referencing.
[–]greybeard 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (3 children)
why don't these r-slurs link it? The search function of the journal is utterly useless
edit: I think I found it: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24964363/
[–]takavoid513 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Low Iq journo fags do this all the time. Many of them just link to the website the study is on, but don't link the actual study.
[–]greybeard 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Fucking pseuds.
Probably the same kind of people who go full "You have a source on that" on you when you make the smallest claim
[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
The average weekly number of intercourses was asked confidentially.
Self-reporting based bullshit, as I had anticipated.
[–]Vortex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Just statusmaxx, bro.
[–]greybeard 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Data for 531 heterosexual men aged 20-54 years were collected in three andrological centers.
Andrological centers also treat stuff like E.D., don't they? If you can't get children, that's also were you go. So the sample should be biased towards sex-havers and not representative of all males. So no, this study doesn't prove the incels wrong.
Article has nice booba in the middle though.
[–]OPStolen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
I'm so tired of seeing this shit across reddit. Just be literally spider-man, Just be a millionaire bro, just literally be above ANY and ALL requirements a woman could possibly have due to your intense level of fame. PLUS, if this doesn't prove JBW i don't know what does.
Also, the number of producers that ORGANIZE these couples. Their managers are literally LAUGHING into thousand bills because of all the people who had no inclination to watch spider-man now going to watch it to see a Short-king with his tall-Happa-famemaxxed girlfriend.
[–]Salvador6feet6[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Sony been doing this pr since the spiderman from 2000. They basically ask their lead female and male actor to act like couple. It’s was kek when Andry Gayfield pretended to be couple with Emma stones. Zendaya is actually dating a 6’5 something athlete white Chad
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
just be danny devito who did have his ugly wife leave him
[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]greybeard 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]takavoid513 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]greybeard 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Vortex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]greybeard 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]OPStolen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Salvador6feet6[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)