you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

men and women are vastly different. men have a totally different chromosome to women.

So, there are males with XY chromosomes who don't respond to testosterone, and physically develop into apparent females.

It's not skin deep, they have brain development totally standard for heterosexual females.

F1000 Commentary: Brain Responses To Sexual Images In 46, XY Women With Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Are Female Typical.

indicating that a Y chromosome is insufficient for male-typical human brain responses.

The genetic differences make zero difference, it's the prenatal hormones. The y chr is a tiny pieces of genetic information and pretty much all it does is make your balls.

Homosexual humans have brains pretty much indistinguishable from each other as a group, and females who have had as enough testosterone to form a pseudo penis have brain development like males until puberty. Even after puberty it's still closer to male normal than a gay males brain.

Short version: your totally wrong about the y chr making any difference at all.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

erm i'm pretty sure there is massive difference between a butch lady and a man, or a homo and a girl. you're literally ignoring all of reality and trying to say they're the same based on same vague brain scan, when you can see with your own fucking eyes and life experience that they are different. a homo may be more girly than a straight man, but a faggot is still far different to a woman.

if the huge gulf between men and women was just testosterone then it would be easy as dosing up to get super abilities, or make a woman as smart as a man as you just pretended was possible. instead all it does is make men a bit stronger and aggressive and same for women. there is far more going on than you realise in that little y chromosome, it contains everything that makes a man so mentally superior. but good luck getting modern science to ever admit that.

[–]GConly 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So.. you are actually an idiot. Nice to know.

i'm pretty sure there is massive difference between a butch lady and a man, or a homo and a girl

Not much difference between a lesbian and a homo. Their brains are almost identical.

Which I was plenty clear about, but you didn't want to see.

Homosexual humans have brains pretty much indistinguishable from each other

Maybe I should have used smaller words for you.

huge gulf between men and women was just testosterone then it would be easy as dosing up to get super abilities

PRE NATAL TESTOSTERONE YOU DIPSHIT.

Adding it to an adult will make sod all difference. A male fetus that doesn't get it ends up typically female.

or make a woman as smart as a man as you just pretended was possible.

Average IQ for male and female is the same. There's nothing on the y chr that increases IQ. All the pn testosterone does is swap some of the neuroanatomy over to specialist visual spatial in males. Probably because being able to hit a running animal with a spear was important for male hunters.

there is far more going on than you realise in that little y chromosome, it contains everything that makes a man so mentally superior.

First no, the y chr has been thoroughly mapped and there's very little to it. We know what all the genes on it do. No genes for extra intelligence on it. Only one affects brain function in any way at all. It doesn't make extra brain cells.

Second: no it's all down to prenatal testosterone.

Third: the incorrect impression that men had higher IQs came from biasing tests for VS, or not including the special ed groups in tests.

Men make up about 70% of idiots and because of defects on the X chromosome. You are also about 90% of seriously violent criminals. If you omit special ed kids from testing it makes male IQ appear a couple of points higher.

mentally superior. but good luck getting modern science to ever admit that.

Your idea of modern science comes from the 1930s. Actual modern science disproved all that crap.

You'd be a laughing stock if you tried to spout that crap in front of the people studying it for a living.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Average IQ for male and female is the same.

no it isn't. regardless the test doesn't properly equate the enormous gulf in logic and reasoning and its importance which is all encompassing. i'm not reading the rest of your garbage post. you're a woman aren't you? no wonder you can't handle the truth. truth will always be a woman's greatest enemy.

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes it is.

Lol.

The Smarter Sex? Women's Average IQ Overtakes Men's

The enormous gulf in logic and reasoning

Well you certainly don't come up to my level.

Some advice, don't rant on about superior male intelligence if you don't reach double digits yourself bro.

[–]lazers 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

ah the old flynn controversy beloved by the media for a short while. too bad most studies either show parity or a slight male advantage.

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Overwhelmingly it's parity.

If it's showing an advantage it's because it's has sampling issues, like the Lynn study on college students.

There's no coding on a y chr that could increase IQ. Also, once you adjust for body fat, the EQ of male and female works out the same, which is important because if you gain or lose 20lbs your IQ won't change. Someone morbidly obese has the same EQ as a chimp, and EQ has a much better relationship to the brain size/IQ predictive theory if you go by fat free mass only.

Short version: it doesn't take brain cells to manage body fat.

This rather strengthens the IQ to brain size correlation, which makes things like predicting IQ by a brain scan even more accurate. As it is you can place IQ into low/average/high by a brain scan alone in about 95% of cases. I suspect if you corrected for lean body mass that would be way more accurate.

Which is going to cause a lot of issues, because average brain size varies by ancestry. It's why I stayed the hell away from that when looking at possible thesis subjects. On the surface it looks like an SJW dream (it solves the apparent sex brain size difference) but if you give it a seconds thought you realise its another nails the coffin of 'no race differences in IQ'.

That's a career ended before it began.

The alt right doesn't know whether to go yay or nay to it either. On the one had it's more data supporting population differences, and it eliminates the possibility that the IQ tests are biased. On the other hand men aren't smarter on average.

They are torn.

[–]lazers 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

most try to adjust for that at least

but anyways it's pointless to scour about for some ideal intelligence gene as it is a culmination of genetic and environmental factors that influence cognition with sex chromosomes and differing gene expressions and hormones being responsible for varying degrees of sex differences. the alt right is generally retarded on a lot of issues so it would come as no surprise if they were to pick some half-arsed soft race realist approach as their hill to die on just as long as they can keep shitting on black men. an approach not too dissimilar from their past love of using asian and JEWISH iq stats as a tool for similar purposes, i guess ultimate white supremacy takes a backseat on some things