use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Rules 1. Follow saidit ToS. 2. No advocating for violence. 3. NO fakecels/chads/trolling or not keeping the conversation relevant to the incel topic. 4.NO Bragging 5.NO harassment of other members. 6.NO ban evasion
Credit to Lord_DC for css
I've created a blue/red/blackpill graph, tell me what you think of it!
submitted 4 years ago by sevenpillarsofcope from i.imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]CrackingYs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
It's an interesting take. But I think there's some fundamental problems with it.
The biggest problem with your graph, is Incels and Redpill are ideologically aligned whereas in your graph they are opposed to eachother. Incel and Redpill both want men and women to be in relationships whereas mgtow and feminists do not. So the graph should reflect that. Incels and Redpill differ in that Incels essentially want traditional monogamous relationships, whereas Redpill want polygamous relationships with multiple partners. I do not consider Redpillers to be traditionalists (mgtow are closer to traditionalists).
So I think maybe there should be 2 axes:
TRADITIONALIST -> PROGRESSIVIST
CELIBACY -> MONOGAM -> POLYGAMY
Incels are TRADITIONALIST and MONOGAMY (midpoint)
RedPill are PROGRESSIVIST and POLYGAMY
MGTOW are TRADITIONALIST and CELIBACY
Feminists are PROGRESSIVIST and CELIBACY
[–]CrackingYs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (1 child)
Here I graphed it up:
https://i.imgur.com/mVolcvX.png
[–]CrackingYs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (0 children)
Updated with Female Dating Strategy, Incel Tears, and 1st/2nd/3rd wave Feminism:
https://i.imgur.com/rZDIHp3.png
view the rest of the comments →
[–]CrackingYs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]CrackingYs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]CrackingYs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)