you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CrackingYs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's an interesting take. But I think there's some fundamental problems with it.

The biggest problem with your graph, is Incels and Redpill are ideologically aligned whereas in your graph they are opposed to eachother. Incel and Redpill both want men and women to be in relationships whereas mgtow and feminists do not. So the graph should reflect that. Incels and Redpill differ in that Incels essentially want traditional monogamous relationships, whereas Redpill want polygamous relationships with multiple partners. I do not consider Redpillers to be traditionalists (mgtow are closer to traditionalists).

So I think maybe there should be 2 axes:

TRADITIONALIST -> PROGRESSIVIST

CELIBACY -> MONOGAM -> POLYGAMY

Incels are TRADITIONALIST and MONOGAMY (midpoint)

RedPill are PROGRESSIVIST and POLYGAMY

MGTOW are TRADITIONALIST and CELIBACY

Feminists are PROGRESSIVIST and CELIBACY

[–]CrackingYs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Here I graphed it up:

https://i.imgur.com/mVolcvX.png

[–]CrackingYs 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Updated with Female Dating Strategy, Incel Tears, and 1st/2nd/3rd wave Feminism:

https://i.imgur.com/rZDIHp3.png