you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FatBoySlim 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

We'll see how it will turn out, while I agree with the second point, I kinda agree with the first (but you see that sentence differently than me).

I'm kinda positive, but please do more research on any posts that get reported next time.

[–]magnora7[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

I'm kinda positive, but please do more research on any posts that get reported next time.

Well that's the thing though... I shouldn't have to do research to figure out a post that appears to praise a mass murderer, actually isn't (even though it is definitely not against him either...)

If I make a post that says "KILL ALL X PEOPLE" and then in the content of the post, I say "just kidding". Do you think that should be allowed, because "it's just a joke"? It still has a very clear appearance of advocating violence to people who only read headlines (which is 95% of people). Do you see what I mean? It's not okay to jokingly encourage it if the joke is so unclear it's almost designed to be misunderstood.

[–]curryvirgin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not aware of where this occurred on the sub. I'd appreciate if you could let me know where it did and specifically how, to the extent it required removal of the mod team. Otherwise, I'd appreciate knowing if such transparency does not matter to you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's called PSYOP wars. We are canon fodder.