This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Moses_Sithole 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If you look at literally any aspect that separates man from beast, it's painfully clear that women are lacking in it. Be it self-control, self-sacrifice, contemplation or moralizing. It is clear women do not practice any of these virtues.

Woman operate on one level and one level only: produce healthy children with optimistic futures (in other words: alpha fucks, beta bucks).

This in itself is not actually amoral or wrong in any way. On the contrary, it is perhaps entirely necessary to keep the species going. But beyond this aspect there is nothing more to be said about women. Everything they ever think and do is based around this animal desire.

Men also largely operate on a bodily desire: to spread our seed. And in fact most men never ascend beyond this. They live as an animal and die as an animal. But what separates men from animal is the potential to ascend beyond this.

Women do not have the capacity to practice higher level aspects than that of following animal desires. At least , we have never seem them do so.

Women dont philosophize: there are basically no female philosophers. Women dont contemplate morality, their morals are whatever is necessary to fit in with the herd (a woman needs to fit in with the herd to secure safety for her and her children. In fact I daresay women are better at sticking to whatever customs and morals exist in society than men are, because she does not question them). A woman who is faithful is not practising self-control; she has merely decided that right now the life that her spouse is giving to her is too beneficial to risk losing.

In the end, the only creature that stands out in this world, that is seperate from nature, is man. Women are in the same category as a snake or a fish or a tree or a hurricane. They are just another part of nature that man needs to contend with. They just happen to be the thing that man has to mate with. If man did not exist, Earth would appear to have no intelligent life.

With this in mind it is also important to recognise who the real villains in this feminine society are. It is not women, but the weak men who allowed this to happen. Women are always going to be like this, it is no more useful to get annoyed at women than it is at a dog for shitting on your lawn. You don't blame the dog, you blame the owner. Feminism is like dogs claiming they are being oppressed by not being allowed to shit on lawns. And it can really only succeed if the owner agrees.

[–]Riceand420[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

hmm strange by philosphizing we came to the conclusion that the blames lies not on the femoid but on weak men

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ultimately the removal of the proverbial Chesterton's fence was due to greedy i.e. weak men. Letting women be hypergamous did work for a while. Apparently it was impossible to be incel in the late 1970s and early 1980s. I'm sure a divorce lawyer played a huge role in making it so easy for divorce to occur in the 1970s. Let's not forget all the money made by pharmaceutical companies from birth control, which need I remind you is one of the only drugs the government provides to its citizens for free.

On paper it sounded great! Trickle down sex. I can't pretend I wouldn't have fallen for it myself.

[–]Moses_Sithole 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women are wild animals. Weak men let the animals off their leash. This is the reason why women should be subjugated to a life of oppression and slavery, just like the days of the old testament.