Illinois Supreme Court issues opinion over ongoing White Castle biometric privacy case
submitted 1 year ago by SoCo from (finance.yahoo.com)
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
The judges said the law is plain: just because you do something a LOT of times, that doesn't make it any less illegal to do it once. Every time is illegal. Applied to, e.g., murder, this is a simple thing to understand. Applied to automated data transactions . . . companies in Illinois better start understanding in a hurry.
James Zouras, the attorney representing the plaintiff, told Reuters that "hopefully, today’s decision will encourage employers and other biometric data collectors to finally start taking the law seriously."
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Share news and your thoughts about the 21st US state, Illinois!
We aren't just Chicago!
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)