all 3 comments

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I notice that the limit of 3 is too small. 6 might be ok.

But there is another problem, that has to do with popularity.
Some high quality posts are not even upvoted.
While those that are hyped topics do get upvotes.

So to get more quality on the site, people should first upvote quality instead of hype.

It would be interesting to have some other ways of voting.
Maybe in combination with some moderation help and flairs / keywords / emoticons.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would be interesting to have some other ways of voting.

Voting factions with separate vote types? This site doesn't have enough users for complex voting systems.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We can't edit posts, remember? I know that all local subs are dead, but if they were alive, your rules would unnecessary complicate their work. There is no reason to restrict how much sub owners can post in their subs.

If this site had users, they would vote for their favorite new posts in their favorite subs, and the front page would be filled with quality content. Irregardless of the overall number of posts.

If you care about mental health this much, you should support the addition of SAD votes.