you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

for some reason your comment ended up in spam I don't know why. But anyways

If I didn't make this sub Jasoncarswell would have made it, he even said so. I understand you think it doesn't need it's own sub but JasonCarswell felt it did, I made it so that hopefully I can make sure JasonCarswell doesn't try to make claims about it without proper basis.

While I would rather these subs not exist as you would since this sub would have been made either way I felt that why not make it actually proper discussion of the topic instead of just treating it like truth and fact like JasonCarswell would have. In fact I intend this to allow both sides of discussion so it won't be one sided like Voat.

This is more for debate of the topic.

I made this sub only because I feel since it would have happened either way maybe I could have kept it from going downhill and make sure fair discussion can stay instead of treating "Holocaust never happened" as truth like JasonCarswell most likely would have.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fine, but I would suggest just letting this sub die off and not posting things in it, if we really want saidit to not be voat. There really does not need to be a community built around this topic. People should go to voat if that's what they want.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why? Revisionism does not meam denying the holocaust out right. Even the term holocaust makes little sense? Death through fire by sacrafice? I would go on to castle hill publisher forums and you'll see that holocaust skepticism is not voat retoric, much of it is well placed in facts and in fact, revisionism sucessfully lowered the Aushwitz deaths from 4.5 million to just over a million mostly due to starvation and disease at the very end of the war. The idea of revisionism isn't a hate for Jews, but for Truth. I think maybe a sub dedicated historical revisionism is a great thing, aslong as it is civil. Who cares what the media thinks, revisionism is not racist and is not denial. Many of the prominent skeptics who have delved into this topic have been what the media calls self-loathing Jews.

Magnora, if people follow the phramid of debate. Revisionism should not be censored. You'll find that much of what we've been taught concerning the germans and thr camps is patently false. That isn't to say Jews were not executed or taken from their homes. But even this subject, despite its controversy should be made available.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A+++

/s/AlternativeHistory is often used synonymously with Historical Revisionism, though the later often has negative connotations pushed by the mainstream.

Once you start looking you'll often find a LOT of parallels with 9/11.

It's a very deep and disturbing rabbit hole with countless tributaries across many many generations often needing far reaching historical context.